<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Existing walls and new walls fills display in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9378#M3999</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;jhutchison wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I always create existing walls with empy fills since most of them are not part of the construction. New walls are poched with fills so that more information decribes them.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Wish I could do that, but  the local authorities wouldn't accept that !&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks anyways !&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Naftali</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:49:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-03-11T17:49:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Existing walls and new walls fills display</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9375#M3996</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;In a project for an addition to an existing building, where the new walls are composite.  It's normal practice to show existing walls with a solid fill,  and yet for the first stages of a project I don't need to show the composition for the new walls to "the powers that be", but I find it very useful, to test and check how everything fits together.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is there a way/setting to be able to display the solid fill for the existing wall and yet still display the NEW walls as empty for printing purposes, until later on?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Of course a workaround would be to just do the new walls with empty fills at first, and just "syringe" change them later on, but is there another more "intelligent" way ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
TIA&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Naftali&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:12:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9375#M3996</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-11T15:12:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Existing walls and new walls fills display</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9376#M3997</link>
      <description>You could create the composite wall types for the new walls with all empty fills to start and then change them when it's time for CDs.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:19:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9376#M3997</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-11T15:19:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Existing walls and new walls fills display</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9377#M3998</link>
      <description>I always create existing walls with empy fills since most of them are not part of the construction. New walls are poched with fills so that more information decribes them.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:53:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9377#M3998</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-11T16:53:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Existing walls and new walls fills display</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9378#M3999</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;jhutchison wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I always create existing walls with empy fills since most of them are not part of the construction. New walls are poched with fills so that more information decribes them.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Wish I could do that, but  the local authorities wouldn't accept that !&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks anyways !&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Naftali</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:49:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9378#M3999</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-11T17:49:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Existing walls and new walls fills display</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9379#M4000</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Naftali wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;jhutchison wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I always create existing walls with empy fills since most of them are not part of the construction. New walls are poched with fills so that more information decribes them.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Wish I could do that, but  the local authorities wouldn't accept that !&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks anyways !&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Naftali&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Just curious...What is it that your local authorities find unacceptable about this? &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_eek.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:01:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9379#M4000</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dave Jochum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-12T00:01:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Existing walls and new walls fills display</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9380#M4001</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Dave wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Naftali wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;jhutchison wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I always create existing walls with empy fills since most of them are not part of the construction. New walls are poched with fills so that more information decribes them.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Wish I could do that, but  the local authorities wouldn't accept that !&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks anyways !&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Naftali&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Just curious...What is it that your local authorities find unacceptable about this? &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_eek.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

European conventions, I suppose.  For large size multi-story room additions, you got to admit that having the existing building in black makes the "white" additions "pop out" on the floor plans and sections.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Anyway, can I just turn this into a wishlist item:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Change display variable of construction fills of walls from a Global variable to an individual wall variable.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Naftali</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 05:16:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9380#M4001</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-12T05:16:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Existing walls and new walls fills display</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9381#M4002</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Naftali wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a way/setting to be able to display the solid fill for the existing wall and yet still display the NEW walls as empty for printing purposes, until later on?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

You might have an "existing" and "New" view, with different display options, and then superimpose them in PlotMaker. When the preliminaries are over, then re-arrange.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 06:57:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9381#M4002</guid>
      <dc:creator>Djordje</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-12T06:57:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Existing walls and new walls fills display</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9382#M4003</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Naftali wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Dave wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Naftali wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;

Wish I could do that, but  the local authorities wouldn't accept that !&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks anyways !&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Naftali&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Just curious...What is it that your local authorities find unacceptable about this? &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_eek.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

European conventions, I suppose.  For large size multi-story room additions, you got to admit that having the existing building in black makes the "white" additions "pop out" on the floor plans and sections.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Anyway, can I just turn this into a wishlist item:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Change display variable of construction fills of walls from a Global variable to an individual wall variable.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Naftali&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Sorry, I wasn't clear--and also, sorry to everyone else for continuing the off-topic portion of this thread, but my interest is piqued--but what is it specifically that is unacceptable? Is there a convention for poche-ing walls that is mandated, and if so, what is it?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:20:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Existing-walls-and-new-walls-fills-display/m-p/9382#M4003</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dave Jochum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-12T07:20:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

