<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ArchiCAD 11 in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/79044#M40853</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;gbley wrote:&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
I am also a cynic.  I just sat through the reseller's dog and pony and I come away more convinced more than ever that this is ArchiCAD 10.1.  There is very little that is surprising and absolutely nothing that takes my breath away.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;Most of you know that I'm an independent consultant with no business association with any resellers or Graphisoft.  But, thought I should say that for those who don't know.&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Gary, it sounds to me like your reseller - generally one of the most knowledgeable guys - just didn't really show you all of the power of 11, or maybe you didn't listen well. There is much more than indicated by your comments.&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Worksheets....Detail windows with detail-in-detail capabilities.  All this does is eliminate one or two layers of view sets.  A bit more convenient but not a new feature by any stretch.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Well, they also permit capturing everything - including text and dimensions - something not possible before with the Detail Tool.  (This is the default behavior of the Worksheet Tool, but can be turned off.  The default for the Detail Tool is to turn anno capture off, as it is in 10.)  I'll agree that this is pretty much a 10.1 thing, but it resolves a complaint often heard here on ac-talk.&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Visual compare......Open an elevation view and use a marquee to choose it.  Copy it to the clipboard.  Go back to a section or plan view and paste.......duh!  Works just fine for most needs.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Virtual Trace......Ghost story on steroids.  Convenience factor...3 on a scale of 10.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

I've got to combine these two, since Visual Compare is basically just a visual trick on Virtual Trace.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But...you've missed the point of this really powerful addition.  No, you cannot marquee/copy as you describe...unless you are willing to have all of the layers in the copied elements (now linework) visible in your working view...when you place the copy to the side or wherever (and do tedious sideways referencing).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Virtual Trace is indeed ghosting on steroids...but with a convenience factor of 11 out of 10.  Consider:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
- ANY view can be the reference (ghost) - not just a story as now&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
- Because it is a VIEW that can be the reference, the ghosted elements can have totally different layer combo and model view options from the working view.  Consider:  ghosting a structural section behind a model section or elevation.  Ghosting a layout behind the drawing to guide placement of dimensions and annotation.  Ghosting an elevation behind a floor plan to visually check / align windows, etc. And so much more.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
- But, viewpoint (navigator items) can be the reference also - in which case the current layer combo/etc will apply to the reference (ghost).  So, you can ghost stories as you have until 11.  But, you can also work with ghosted sections and have the working section and the reference respond to layer changes.  (Personally, the view concept is where I'll be most of the time, but this viewpoint method adds great flexibility.)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
- You simply right click any Navigator or View Set item to make it the reference (ghost)...and that ghost 'sticks' to the working view.  So, if you ghost something to the north elevation - it will be the reference the next time you go there.  Etc.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
- There is a 'switch reference with active' button, something long wished for, so if you notice something on the reference that you want to change, you can instantly get there as the working view with the previous working view as the reference.  Powerful.  Think about doing structural plans where you are referencing stories above and below, but with different views (model vs structure) and switching back and forth seamlessly as you carry your bearing points.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
- Until 11, we typically had to bring in 2D AutoCAD drawings onto fake stories in order to ghost them for tracing/conversion into models.  With 11, those xrefs can be placed on a Worksheet which becomes the ghost for any working view...and can be dragged, rotated, repositioned in any way needed underneath the working view.  (Further, those xref layers are segregated in the layers dialog.)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The Visual Compare is just a little lame in that it is indeed purely visual.  It is a slick graphic interface that lets you peal away the working view to reveal only the reference while comparing.  But, you'll never notice if something is 5mm off.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
These are incredible productivity boosters for all offices doing all kinds of work.&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Come on GS.  This is pathetic.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Sorry that I disagree.  I think that GS has released a great upgrade at a reasonable price.  There really are lots more things in 11, of course.  Pen Sets assigned by view; transparency in OpenGL; link any marker to any view/drawing (all of those 'typ' structural callouts are now easy and dynamic); long file names (at last!); calculated volumes for the components of profiled walls, beams, and columns; and lots more.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Hopefully the marketing machine will catch up with the product announcement.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;
Karl</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 04:52:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Karl Ottenstein</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-23T04:52:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78943#M40752</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;ArchiCAD 11 will come soon (as much as I suspect..)&lt;BR /&gt;
What can AC 11 do better than AC10?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:08:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78943#M40752</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T10:08:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78944#M40753</link>
      <description>Anyone who knows is bound by an non-disclosure agreement. You shouldn't get an answer here until GS publicly announces it.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;
Link.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:16:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78944#M40753</guid>
      <dc:creator>Link</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T11:16:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78945#M40754</link>
      <description>I'd it expect it to be October / November 2007. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Outside bet that it could be announced at Septembers archicad university , but I wouldnt bank on it!!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:32:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78945#M40754</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T11:32:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78946#M40755</link>
      <description>Remember that when AC10 came out,  GS claimed that they are on a 12-month release cycle now, so May or June is likely.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So far, there has not been any official statements about AC11 from Graphisoft.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:28:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78946#M40755</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T13:28:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78947#M40756</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;TomWaltz wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Remember that when AC10 came out,  GS claimed that they are on a 12-month release cycle now, so May or June is likely.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Gotta keep up with the Jones....</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:49:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78947#M40756</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Davis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T17:49:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78948#M40757</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Scott wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;TomWaltz wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Remember that when AC10 came out,  GS claimed that they are on a 12-month release cycle now, so May or June is likely.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Gotta keep up with the Jones....&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

assuming the Jones' ever catch up...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:55:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78948#M40757</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T17:55:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78949#M40758</link>
      <description>If AC11 will come soon, it must be much better than AC10.&lt;BR /&gt;
But it is almost impossible.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:27:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78949#M40758</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T18:27:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78950#M40759</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Archi wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;If AC11 will come soon, it must be much better than AC10.&lt;BR /&gt;
But it is almost impossible.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

It's impossible.... because 10 is so good? Or because it's rare to have two great releases in a row?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:42:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78950#M40759</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T18:42:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78951#M40760</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;TomWaltz wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Scott wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;TomWaltz wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Remember that when AC10 came out,  GS claimed that they are on a 12-month release cycle now, so May or June is likely.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Gotta keep up with the Jones....&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

assuming the Jones' ever catch up...&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Ha!  That's funny considering AC would be no where near a 12 month release cycle if it weren't for Revit's release cycle.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:05:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78951#M40760</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Davis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T20:05:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78952#M40761</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;TomWaltz wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Archi wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;If AC11 will come soon, it must be much better than AC10. &lt;BR /&gt;
But it is almost impossible.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
It's impossible.... because 10 is so good? Or because it's rare to have two great releases in a row?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
AC 10 is quite enough as CAD. Normal (or special but not crazy) architects can do everything without problem with AC10. &lt;BR /&gt;
GS must consider to sell more AC10 (not to make AC 11) worldwide and bring more tips and show more possibilities with existing tools. &lt;BR /&gt;
Allplan or VW or Revit has no chance.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:18:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78952#M40761</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T20:18:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78953#M40762</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Scott wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Ha!  That's funny considering AC would be no where near a 12 month release cycle if it weren't for Revit's release cycle.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

And Revit would be no where near where it is if it weren't for ArchiCAD... &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_lol.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:39:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78953#M40762</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laura Yanoviak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T23:39:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78954#M40763</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Archi wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;If AC11 will come soon, it must be much better than AC10.&lt;BR /&gt;
But it is almost impossible.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
 At least, it is nice to see such a lover of AC10  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_confused.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_confused.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 06:11:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78954#M40763</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T06:11:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78955#M40764</link>
      <description>Hey Scott, &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
An honest question, not trying to be sarcastic or stir things up, none of that even though it cold be taken that way, HONESTLY! After the last go-round about Nemetschek I am really hoping for a new level of maturity and productivity to emerge. That was flat embarrassing!.............Anyway, I digress, I am kind of confused about why you participate over here, in AC-land? Is it just to raise a little hell? Drum up sales for your guys by "dissing" our product, [from your signature it seems that would directly benefit you, and Lord knows we do a pretty good job of that all on our own  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_confused.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; ], or, well, I mean, well, I just don't really get it. Why spend your time over here? I don't really care one way or the other, just plain curious after seeing your smilin' avatar and, shall we say, &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;competitive&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; comments over the past however long it's been.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 06:24:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78955#M40764</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jefferson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T06:24:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78956#M40765</link>
      <description>May I ask when was AC10 window version released?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 06:56:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78956#M40765</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T06:56:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78957#M40766</link>
      <description>Scott. It is just Mouse hunt. More important from how often software is released is how much work have been done during certain time frame. I think AC looks better in that area. And one more thing. AC previous cycle as I remember was 18 months, so not that much different.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:15:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78957#M40766</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T12:15:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78958#M40767</link>
      <description>In the german ArchiCAD-Forum, Graphisoft is seeking for AC11-Beta-Tester:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.archiforum.info/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=007397" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.archiforum.info/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=007397" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.archiforum.info/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=007397" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/S&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://www.archiforum.info/ubb/ultimate ... 3;t=007397"&gt;http://www.archiforum.info/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=007397&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:59:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78958#M40767</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T12:59:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78959#M40768</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;ray wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;May I ask when was AC10 window version released?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

I think it was late May 2006</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:02:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78959#M40768</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T13:02:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78960#M40769</link>
      <description>Such short intervals between the releases trouble me! Is it really enough for a new version? If you have looked at AutoCAD during the recent years the have had 6 releases since the year 2000 and no major new tools!  &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
It is like the washing machines commercials: "Here is the NEW Ariel! Go buy it! It makes white even more whiter!"  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_biggrin.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_mad.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_cry.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:07:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78960#M40769</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T13:07:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78961#M40770</link>
      <description>I agree with kliment, Autocad and Revit are both upgraded every 12 months, however there is not much to show for it, particularly autocad.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
GS who have had a policy of 18 month cyclical upgrades tend to pack more things in. I think id vote for 18 and more, rather than 12 and less!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:25:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78961#M40770</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T13:25:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78962#M40771</link>
      <description>To be honest there have been a lot of work done. Major changes just since 2002 (after version 7 not chronologically - just from the top of my head - correct me if I'm wrong)&lt;BR /&gt;
-real OpenGL in 3D (not some preview window)&lt;BR /&gt;
-functional right mouse button&lt;BR /&gt;
-Scroll zoom&lt;BR /&gt;
-Total Interface rework (personally for the best - still things to be done but much better that before)&lt;BR /&gt;
-Plotmaker Integration (with total rearrangement of menus - again personally I love the idea - bit a learning curve for the old AC users but totally worth it. Some changes, adjustments needed though)&lt;BR /&gt;
-Solid Element Operations - that was a hit but it needs improvements (like snapping to new points and edges, effects of operation visible in plan etc)&lt;BR /&gt;
-Custom profiles - again a hit that requires improvement (not usable in Curved walls, just one pair of stretching lines, lack of parameters, no profiles for Slab and roof edges&lt;BR /&gt;
-Favorites - I like it a lot - it could be improved (as always)&lt;BR /&gt;
    -Locking of favorites to the elements - changes to the favorite setup modify all the objects that have this favorite assigned&lt;BR /&gt;
    -Possibility to assign selected set of attributes per object (just geometry but not pens and layers for example.&lt;BR /&gt;
    -Using Favorites in indexes (Column schedule)&lt;BR /&gt;
    -Possibility to modify the Favorite directly from the Tool properties window&lt;BR /&gt;
    -Favorites with preview&lt;BR /&gt;
    -Favorites for Objects, Lamps, should have hierarchical structure so we could create customized libraries without library editing&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That's it for now, but there is lot more.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:34:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78962#M40771</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T13:34:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

