<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ArchiCAD 11 in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/79142#M40951</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;~/archiben wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Aaron wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I don't see the logic of Steve's argument either.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
steve's failed to understand most of what he's been wittering on about for the past year or so.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
GS's '&lt;A href="http://www.applecoredesigns.co.uk/software/ductwork.html" target="_blank"&gt;ductwork for archicad&lt;/A&gt;' add-on has been available at cost in the UK for since forever (it used to be called 'HVAC for archicad' which - i think - used to be called 'Cymap'). what they have in the constructor looks to be a more advanced version of that.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
regarding which one, whether or not they give it away free, and whether it's just confined to north america . . . well, i'll be with djordje watching you lot asphyxiate  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_wink.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
~/archiben&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

To understand the 'logic' (or lack thereof) as well as all the wittering, you have to realize that he's under the woefully misguided and misconceived impression that Constructor and ArchiCAD are both geared towards, and being marketed to, the same marketbase (i.e architects). In essence, that they are competing against each other - that's where he's coming from. Which, if the creation of Vico Software for purposes of the separation of the development and marketing of both programs is anything to go by, is clearly not the case. ArchiCAD is, has always been and will for the foreseeable future remain primarily an architect's tool.  Constructor, on the  other hand, as an offshoot of ArchiCAD's BIM engine is a prototypical tool created by Graphisoft to venture into a largely incipient and, at the moment, considerably raw, clientbase and clientele; i.e. the BIM-conscious Contractor and Construction engineer. I say largely incipient, because the concept of BIM or virtual building (and/or construction) is mostly unknown to most contractors and engineers who still operate and communicate in Flatland 2D CAD. Think of it as a pioneering venture by the same company that first waded into Virtual Building and BIM over 20 years ago,  to a field that `s worth hundreds of billions of dollars in charged fees every year. In this sense, Graphisoft, (and now Vico softawre), never ever intended for Constructor to be used nor marketed as an architect's design tool or to be marketed to architects.  Despite the fact that it looks and feels ( for the most, anyway) part like ArchiCAD - or rather a seriously souped up version of ArchiCAD.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Unfortunately this simple fact seems to perpetually elude some who are constantly under to impression that ArchiCAD's development continues to be hampered by the presence of Constructor - despite the formation of a seperate company to take over it's development and despite the fact that we've never really seen Constructor being heavily marketed to Architects as one would assume would be the case for someone anxious to try to get you to switch. Don't bother trying to explain any of this to him nor conversely gleaning any "logic" from him - 'twould indeed be a complete waste of your otherwise precious time.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The fact of the matter is that despite the presence of third-party MEP ( including HVAC and some Structural) plugins for ArchiCAD since as far back as versions 6.5 and 7.0, Graphisoft have tended to make the deliberate decision not to develop nor intergrate these functions into ArchiCAD ( the way they are integrated completely into Constructor) for the simple reason that, the larger portion of their clientbase ( as in the European and Asian markets) see a stark separation of these functions, (in their design and profesional culture),  from normal architectural functions and don`t consider it part of their mandate in design, as might be the case or the culture in the North American market, for example, where it's not unusual to find large firms that handle everything from conceptual design to documentation to  structural and mechanical functions and even construction. So they ( Graphisoft) wisely elected not to clunk down their engine in previous versions, and instead give the user the option of obtaining the modules themselve if they did indeed need them. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But since more and more architects today are getting more tech-savvy and well-versed in BIM and Virtual Building as well as project management and construction site management, thanks to better tools like ArchiCAD - and thus even asking for these tools - it shouldn't surprise anyone if GS decide to include these MEP and structural-type functions into the core program, or at least the option to have them there, within the next couple of versions. Especially with a more improved, faster  and stable BIM parametric engine.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The discussion regarding the influence of Constructor on this likelyhood is neither here nor there and should be just as promptly disregarded as such.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:11:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bricklyne Clarence</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-06-01T00:11:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78943#M40752</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;ArchiCAD 11 will come soon (as much as I suspect..)&lt;BR /&gt;
What can AC 11 do better than AC10?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:08:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78943#M40752</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T10:08:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78944#M40753</link>
      <description>Anyone who knows is bound by an non-disclosure agreement. You shouldn't get an answer here until GS publicly announces it.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;
Link.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:16:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78944#M40753</guid>
      <dc:creator>Link</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T11:16:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78945#M40754</link>
      <description>I'd it expect it to be October / November 2007. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Outside bet that it could be announced at Septembers archicad university , but I wouldnt bank on it!!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:32:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78945#M40754</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T11:32:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78946#M40755</link>
      <description>Remember that when AC10 came out,  GS claimed that they are on a 12-month release cycle now, so May or June is likely.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So far, there has not been any official statements about AC11 from Graphisoft.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:28:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78946#M40755</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T13:28:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78947#M40756</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;TomWaltz wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Remember that when AC10 came out,  GS claimed that they are on a 12-month release cycle now, so May or June is likely.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Gotta keep up with the Jones....</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:49:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78947#M40756</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Davis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T17:49:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78948#M40757</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Scott wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;TomWaltz wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Remember that when AC10 came out,  GS claimed that they are on a 12-month release cycle now, so May or June is likely.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Gotta keep up with the Jones....&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

assuming the Jones' ever catch up...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:55:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78948#M40757</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T17:55:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78949#M40758</link>
      <description>If AC11 will come soon, it must be much better than AC10.&lt;BR /&gt;
But it is almost impossible.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:27:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78949#M40758</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T18:27:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78950#M40759</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Archi wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;If AC11 will come soon, it must be much better than AC10.&lt;BR /&gt;
But it is almost impossible.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

It's impossible.... because 10 is so good? Or because it's rare to have two great releases in a row?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:42:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78950#M40759</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T18:42:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78951#M40760</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;TomWaltz wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Scott wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;TomWaltz wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Remember that when AC10 came out,  GS claimed that they are on a 12-month release cycle now, so May or June is likely.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Gotta keep up with the Jones....&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

assuming the Jones' ever catch up...&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Ha!  That's funny considering AC would be no where near a 12 month release cycle if it weren't for Revit's release cycle.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:05:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78951#M40760</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Davis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T20:05:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78952#M40761</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;TomWaltz wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Archi wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;If AC11 will come soon, it must be much better than AC10. &lt;BR /&gt;
But it is almost impossible.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
It's impossible.... because 10 is so good? Or because it's rare to have two great releases in a row?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
AC 10 is quite enough as CAD. Normal (or special but not crazy) architects can do everything without problem with AC10. &lt;BR /&gt;
GS must consider to sell more AC10 (not to make AC 11) worldwide and bring more tips and show more possibilities with existing tools. &lt;BR /&gt;
Allplan or VW or Revit has no chance.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:18:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78952#M40761</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T20:18:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78953#M40762</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Scott wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Ha!  That's funny considering AC would be no where near a 12 month release cycle if it weren't for Revit's release cycle.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

And Revit would be no where near where it is if it weren't for ArchiCAD... &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_lol.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:39:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78953#M40762</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laura Yanoviak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T23:39:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78954#M40763</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Archi wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;If AC11 will come soon, it must be much better than AC10.&lt;BR /&gt;
But it is almost impossible.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
 At least, it is nice to see such a lover of AC10  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_confused.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_confused.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 06:11:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78954#M40763</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T06:11:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78955#M40764</link>
      <description>Hey Scott, &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
An honest question, not trying to be sarcastic or stir things up, none of that even though it cold be taken that way, HONESTLY! After the last go-round about Nemetschek I am really hoping for a new level of maturity and productivity to emerge. That was flat embarrassing!.............Anyway, I digress, I am kind of confused about why you participate over here, in AC-land? Is it just to raise a little hell? Drum up sales for your guys by "dissing" our product, [from your signature it seems that would directly benefit you, and Lord knows we do a pretty good job of that all on our own  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_confused.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; ], or, well, I mean, well, I just don't really get it. Why spend your time over here? I don't really care one way or the other, just plain curious after seeing your smilin' avatar and, shall we say, &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;competitive&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; comments over the past however long it's been.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 06:24:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78955#M40764</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jefferson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T06:24:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78956#M40765</link>
      <description>May I ask when was AC10 window version released?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 06:56:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78956#M40765</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T06:56:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78957#M40766</link>
      <description>Scott. It is just Mouse hunt. More important from how often software is released is how much work have been done during certain time frame. I think AC looks better in that area. And one more thing. AC previous cycle as I remember was 18 months, so not that much different.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:15:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78957#M40766</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T12:15:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78958#M40767</link>
      <description>In the german ArchiCAD-Forum, Graphisoft is seeking for AC11-Beta-Tester:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.archiforum.info/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=007397" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.archiforum.info/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=007397" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.archiforum.info/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=007397" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/S&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://www.archiforum.info/ubb/ultimate ... 3;t=007397"&gt;http://www.archiforum.info/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=007397&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:59:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78958#M40767</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T12:59:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78959#M40768</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;ray wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;May I ask when was AC10 window version released?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

I think it was late May 2006</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:02:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78959#M40768</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T13:02:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78960#M40769</link>
      <description>Such short intervals between the releases trouble me! Is it really enough for a new version? If you have looked at AutoCAD during the recent years the have had 6 releases since the year 2000 and no major new tools!  &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
It is like the washing machines commercials: "Here is the NEW Ariel! Go buy it! It makes white even more whiter!"  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_biggrin.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_mad.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_cry.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:07:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78960#M40769</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T13:07:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78961#M40770</link>
      <description>I agree with kliment, Autocad and Revit are both upgraded every 12 months, however there is not much to show for it, particularly autocad.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
GS who have had a policy of 18 month cyclical upgrades tend to pack more things in. I think id vote for 18 and more, rather than 12 and less!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:25:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78961#M40770</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T13:25:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArchiCAD 11</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78962#M40771</link>
      <description>To be honest there have been a lot of work done. Major changes just since 2002 (after version 7 not chronologically - just from the top of my head - correct me if I'm wrong)&lt;BR /&gt;
-real OpenGL in 3D (not some preview window)&lt;BR /&gt;
-functional right mouse button&lt;BR /&gt;
-Scroll zoom&lt;BR /&gt;
-Total Interface rework (personally for the best - still things to be done but much better that before)&lt;BR /&gt;
-Plotmaker Integration (with total rearrangement of menus - again personally I love the idea - bit a learning curve for the old AC users but totally worth it. Some changes, adjustments needed though)&lt;BR /&gt;
-Solid Element Operations - that was a hit but it needs improvements (like snapping to new points and edges, effects of operation visible in plan etc)&lt;BR /&gt;
-Custom profiles - again a hit that requires improvement (not usable in Curved walls, just one pair of stretching lines, lack of parameters, no profiles for Slab and roof edges&lt;BR /&gt;
-Favorites - I like it a lot - it could be improved (as always)&lt;BR /&gt;
    -Locking of favorites to the elements - changes to the favorite setup modify all the objects that have this favorite assigned&lt;BR /&gt;
    -Possibility to assign selected set of attributes per object (just geometry but not pens and layers for example.&lt;BR /&gt;
    -Using Favorites in indexes (Column schedule)&lt;BR /&gt;
    -Possibility to modify the Favorite directly from the Tool properties window&lt;BR /&gt;
    -Favorites with preview&lt;BR /&gt;
    -Favorites for Objects, Lamps, should have hierarchical structure so we could create customized libraries without library editing&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That's it for now, but there is lot more.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:34:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/ArchiCAD-11/m-p/78962#M40771</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T13:34:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

