<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Mesh Pens - additional in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Mesh-Pens-additional/m-p/90406#M47182</link>
    <description>Separate pen and linetype for the boundary vs the user ridges, would be nice as well.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:09:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>James Murray</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-08T17:09:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mesh Pens - additional</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Mesh-Pens-additional/m-p/90404#M47180</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Don't you find those mesh ridge lines in elevation really frustrating?  Any work-around (and there are a number of them) are just that - work-arounds: and these, by definition, create other problems or increase work time.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
How about a separate pen for "User-defined ridges" as well as the automatically created ridges?  Simple, easy - and I would think completely doable by Graphisoft.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 15:11:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Mesh-Pens-additional/m-p/90404#M47180</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-25T15:11:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mesh Pens - additional</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Mesh-Pens-additional/m-p/90405#M47181</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Bruce wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;How about a separate pen for "User-defined ridges" as well as the automatically created ridges?  Simple, easy - and I would think completely doable by Graphisoft.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
i don't know if you'd call it a workaround but i tend to show only the user defined ridges anyway (and set to "smooth").  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_wink.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;  maybe i'll turn the automatic ones on for some occasional editing, but that's about it.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
with regard to the wish - it wouldn't hurt i guess. i'd probably define it differently just because it's there more than any other reason.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
a better wish may be to kill the mesh and give us a decent bloody terrain modeller to begin, wouldn't it . . ?  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_biggrin.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
~/archiben</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 08:05:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Mesh-Pens-additional/m-p/90405#M47181</guid>
      <dc:creator>__archiben</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-08T08:05:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mesh Pens - additional</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Mesh-Pens-additional/m-p/90406#M47182</link>
      <description>Separate pen and linetype for the boundary vs the user ridges, would be nice as well.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:09:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Mesh-Pens-additional/m-p/90406#M47182</guid>
      <dc:creator>James Murray</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-08T17:09:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mesh Pens - additional</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Mesh-Pens-additional/m-p/90407#M47183</link>
      <description>I clearly haven't explained myself properly.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In a mesh, there are three different 'ridges': 1. the Outline, 2. User defined ridges (typically your contours), and 3. automatic ridges (the triangles).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You can turn off the automatic ridges by selecting "Show User Defined Ridges" as opposed to "Show All Ridges".  There should also be a selection for "Show Outlines Only" - but that's not what this poll is about.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
When you have "Show User Defined Ridges" selected, your contours will still show up in elevations &amp;amp; sections with depth as horizontal lines (see screenshot).  It's these lines I want to be able to 'hide', whilst still displaying the outline (yes, in both plan and section).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That's what this poll question is asking.  I was hoping to avoid a lengthy post as it doesn't encourage people to read it, but I hope this makes it a bit clearer.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/14352i62CD1392AB756725/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="Mesh Contours.JPG" title="Mesh Contours.JPG" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 20:11:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Mesh-Pens-additional/m-p/90407#M47183</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-08T20:11:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

