<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Group problem in 2d and 3d in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Group-problem-in-2d-and-3d/m-p/92811#M48619</link>
    <description>Thanks for your reply. I report this to my local distributer and they also report this GS. But I think they already know this. We wait the updates.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But grouping in 3D is also big advantage. Thanks for GS.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 07:30:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-11-28T07:30:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Group problem in 2d and 3d</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Group-problem-in-2d-and-3d/m-p/92808#M48616</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I have serios problem about grouping. I wait the last update but I still have it.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If group elements in 3d from different stories then mirror or copy the group, after sometime the copied or mirrored element grouped with most of the other elements . So If I dont check the groups I erase or copy wrong element.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Does any one have this problem? I check the discussions but I couldnt find it.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:46:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Group-problem-in-2d-and-3d/m-p/92808#M48616</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-27T14:46:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Group problem in 2d and 3d</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Group-problem-in-2d-and-3d/m-p/92809#M48617</link>
      <description>I have seen anomolies when manipulating groups containing 2D and 3D elements. Such groups don't behave predictably when copied in the 3D window.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;
Link.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:54:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Group-problem-in-2d-and-3d/m-p/92809#M48617</guid>
      <dc:creator>Link</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-27T22:54:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Group problem in 2d and 3d</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Group-problem-in-2d-and-3d/m-p/92810#M48618</link>
      <description>The ability to group and ungroup in 3D is new and therefore should be used with caution. It seems to be related to the multi-story modules. Oddly, I have also found that multi-story hotlinks become multi-story groups when saved back to AC10.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 03:53:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Group-problem-in-2d-and-3d/m-p/92810#M48618</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-28T03:53:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Group problem in 2d and 3d</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Group-problem-in-2d-and-3d/m-p/92811#M48619</link>
      <description>Thanks for your reply. I report this to my local distributer and they also report this GS. But I think they already know this. We wait the updates.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But grouping in 3D is also big advantage. Thanks for GS.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 07:30:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Group-problem-in-2d-and-3d/m-p/92811#M48619</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-28T07:30:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

