<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Can linked markers in Ac11, really be that dumb? in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Can-linked-markers-in-Ac11-really-be-that-dumb/m-p/93788#M49030</link>
    <description>They're just capable of filling in the text that shows where they are. At first I hoped for the same things you described... then I decided I was happy they worked at all</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:33:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-07-09T11:33:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Can linked markers in Ac11, really be that dumb?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Can-linked-markers-in-Ac11-really-be-that-dumb/m-p/93787#M49029</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I should probably make this a wish, but I thought I'd vent some steam first, and maybe, maybe I'm wrong about this?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
When you place a linked section marker on a section or elevation, referencing back to a source section cutting through that view, you actually have to figure out where it goes and place it there? When, in fact, it can only go in one place and, in theory, ArchiCAD ought to be smart enough to place it there? Then, if you move the source marker, shouldn't all the linked markers move as well?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Unless I'm missing something, these aren't linked in any useful way at all...  "linked" markers are just stupid hyperlinks.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 06:41:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Can-linked-markers-in-Ac11-really-be-that-dumb/m-p/93787#M49029</guid>
      <dc:creator>David Collins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-09T06:41:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can linked markers in Ac11, really be that dumb?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Can-linked-markers-in-Ac11-really-be-that-dumb/m-p/93788#M49030</link>
      <description>They're just capable of filling in the text that shows where they are. At first I hoped for the same things you described... then I decided I was happy they worked at all</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:33:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Can-linked-markers-in-Ac11-really-be-that-dumb/m-p/93788#M49030</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-09T11:33:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can linked markers in Ac11, really be that dumb?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Can-linked-markers-in-Ac11-really-be-that-dumb/m-p/93789#M49031</link>
      <description>For some reason, the linked markers lose their link when in teamwork. Anyone know a fix?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:42:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Can-linked-markers-in-Ac11-really-be-that-dumb/m-p/93789#M49031</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-28T16:42:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can linked markers in Ac11, really be that dumb?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Can-linked-markers-in-Ac11-really-be-that-dumb/m-p/93790#M49032</link>
      <description>Steven,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What build of ArchiCAd 11 are you on? If it's not 1086, please make sure to upgrade.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Greg</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:40:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Can-linked-markers-in-Ac11-really-be-that-dumb/m-p/93790#M49032</guid>
      <dc:creator>Greg Kmethy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-01T14:40:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

