<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 2D drawing (worksheet related) in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/2D-drawing-worksheet-related/m-p/108216#M57001</link>
    <description>Then check the consolidate fills command to see if it helps. Though I still think it might be recommended to develop a procedure to handle Wall Sections live since they are "mostly" like regular sections.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:05:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Eduardo Rolon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-20T17:05:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>2D drawing (worksheet related)</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/2D-drawing-worksheet-related/m-p/108213#M56998</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Whether I'm working in elevations, sections, or especially wall sections, there always comes a point when I need to convert the auto model into a 2d drawing.  From what I can tell, copying and pasting everything has the exact same effect as making a worksheet.  But either way, everything becomes overly complicated when what used to be a wall or element, and should just be a fill with an outline, becomes a fill with a separate line for every edge of the fill.  Is there a way to fix this issue?  What am I missing?  Thanks!&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:38:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/2D-drawing-worksheet-related/m-p/108213#M56998</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-20T14:38:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2D drawing (worksheet related)</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/2D-drawing-worksheet-related/m-p/108214#M56999</link>
      <description>Actually you shouldn't have to convert your elevations, sections et al to drawings, just keep them on auto.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:26:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/2D-drawing-worksheet-related/m-p/108214#M56999</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eduardo Rolon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-20T16:26:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2D drawing (worksheet related)</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/2D-drawing-worksheet-related/m-p/108215#M57000</link>
      <description>I don't always have to with elevations and bldg sections, but with wall sections its near impossible to just "draw over" the auto ones when I'm trying to put in a custom window or structural member not available in 3d.  You can only put empty fills over so much until you start losing a lot of precision when adjusting them to line weights, etc.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:41:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/2D-drawing-worksheet-related/m-p/108215#M57000</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-20T16:41:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2D drawing (worksheet related)</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/2D-drawing-worksheet-related/m-p/108216#M57001</link>
      <description>Then check the consolidate fills command to see if it helps. Though I still think it might be recommended to develop a procedure to handle Wall Sections live since they are "mostly" like regular sections.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:05:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/2D-drawing-worksheet-related/m-p/108216#M57001</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eduardo Rolon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-20T17:05:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

