<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Explode in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Explode/m-p/111780#M59088</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I just discovered something unfortunate about "Explode" in AC 8.1 &lt;BR /&gt;
and I assume in AC 9 (I haven't checked).&lt;BR /&gt;
I have a 2D library part that draws a bunch of splines within a 6"x6" area.&lt;BR /&gt;
I use it often to do construction details. Instead of drawing every&lt;BR /&gt;
piece of stone in say, a foundation drain detail, I place several instances&lt;BR /&gt;
of the lib part, explode them and then drag hand fulls of these splines&lt;BR /&gt;
around to draw the detail. At least, that's what I did in versions before 8.1.&lt;BR /&gt;
Now when I explode the library part they are no longer splines but grouped&lt;BR /&gt;
lines and all the lines of what were splines are all grouped together&lt;BR /&gt;
not in a nested group. So, now I can't use this method for drawing or&lt;BR /&gt;
use this lib part anymore because of how "Explode" now works.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Does any one know of a way to simulate the former behavior of "Explode" ?&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank you,&lt;BR /&gt;
Peter Devlin&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 02:51:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-06-30T02:51:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Explode</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Explode/m-p/111780#M59088</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I just discovered something unfortunate about "Explode" in AC 8.1 &lt;BR /&gt;
and I assume in AC 9 (I haven't checked).&lt;BR /&gt;
I have a 2D library part that draws a bunch of splines within a 6"x6" area.&lt;BR /&gt;
I use it often to do construction details. Instead of drawing every&lt;BR /&gt;
piece of stone in say, a foundation drain detail, I place several instances&lt;BR /&gt;
of the lib part, explode them and then drag hand fulls of these splines&lt;BR /&gt;
around to draw the detail. At least, that's what I did in versions before 8.1.&lt;BR /&gt;
Now when I explode the library part they are no longer splines but grouped&lt;BR /&gt;
lines and all the lines of what were splines are all grouped together&lt;BR /&gt;
not in a nested group. So, now I can't use this method for drawing or&lt;BR /&gt;
use this lib part anymore because of how "Explode" now works.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Does any one know of a way to simulate the former behavior of "Explode" ?&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank you,&lt;BR /&gt;
Peter Devlin&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 02:51:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Explode/m-p/111780#M59088</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-30T02:51:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Explode</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Explode/m-p/111781#M59089</link>
      <description>Because of the problem concerning "explode" mentioned&lt;BR /&gt;
in my previous post, I decided to make a "Symbol Fill"&lt;BR /&gt;
from a collection of splines that fit into a 6" x 6" square.&lt;BR /&gt;
I have been using this fill for detailing.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
On a recent project I noticed that the file size increased&lt;BR /&gt;
dramatically after a page of details was added to the project.&lt;BR /&gt;
One of the details was a module file of a foundation detail&lt;BR /&gt;
that was created in AC 6.0 and had the splines as described&lt;BR /&gt;
in my previous post.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I made a new project merged this module into it and&lt;BR /&gt;
copied it and saved as "Module from Clip Board".&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I made another new project and merged the same&lt;BR /&gt;
module into the project. Then I removed all of the&lt;BR /&gt;
splines and in their place drew the symbol fill&lt;BR /&gt;
made from the 6" x 6" collection of splines.&lt;BR /&gt;
I then saved as "Module from Clip Board".&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I then did a "Get Info" for the three module files.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The size of the original 6.0 module file was 288 MB.&lt;BR /&gt;
The size of the 8.1 copy was 300 MB.&lt;BR /&gt;
The size of the 8.1 file with the symbol fill &lt;BR /&gt;
substituted for the splines was 604 MB.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Dose this imply that symbol fills are more expensive&lt;BR /&gt;
than the set of lines, arcs, and splines that were used to make the fill ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
As demonstrated by the 288 vs 300 MB,  Is any file saved in 8.1 format &lt;BR /&gt;
larger than the same file saved in a version previous to 8.1 ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Does anyone have any information about this ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank you,&lt;BR /&gt;
Peter Devlin</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Explode/m-p/111781#M59089</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-03T00:31:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

