<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Why is this so hard? in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Why-is-this-so-hard/m-p/120903#M63908</link>
    <description>Why not convert the Objective objects to Morphs?</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:09:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Eduardo Rolon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-21T21:09:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why is this so hard?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Why-is-this-so-hard/m-p/120902#M63907</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I'm trying to create a detailed object (woodwork) by adding dowels to show construction method.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I've created the profiles with OBJECTiVE, but I didn't realise that you cannot SEO on these tools.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I've tried a complex profile (wall) but because part of the woodwork is curved and the way in which walls work, the curves are slightly jagged.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
How would you go about creating a similar object to the attachment, ensuring that you can SEO them to create holes for the dowels whilst ensure perfect curved contours?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
It's very frustrating that such a simple operation cannot be done. Am I using the wrong tool?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank you&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/71497i7984C40DC4B49E3E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="Screen Shot 2013-02-21 at 20.42.53.png" title="Screen Shot 2013-02-21 at 20.42.53.png" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 14:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Why-is-this-so-hard/m-p/120902#M63907</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-23T14:32:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is this so hard?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Why-is-this-so-hard/m-p/120903#M63908</link>
      <description>Why not convert the Objective objects to Morphs?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:09:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Why-is-this-so-hard/m-p/120903#M63908</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eduardo Rolon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-21T21:09:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is this so hard?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Why-is-this-so-hard/m-p/120904#M63909</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;ejrolon wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Why not convert the Objective objects to Morphs?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

That's exactly what I just did before coming back here!!!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
It worked perfectly. I'm taking this into C4D for rendering so it's important that I can get it done as simply as possible... I don't know how to model in C4D.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So pleased this worked. What if I had an earlier version of ArchiCAD? Would there be another solution?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Also, how could I slightly smooth off the edges so they are not so sharp? I've tried the "Soft Edges" options but that's too much. The 3D pet palette to Chamer/Fillet also just makes weird distortions and doesn't smooth out the edges.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank you</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:34:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Why-is-this-so-hard/m-p/120904#M63909</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-21T21:34:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is this so hard?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Why-is-this-so-hard/m-p/120905#M63910</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Designernat wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I've created the profiles with OBJECTiVE, but I didn't realise that you cannot SEO on these tools.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
SEO should work fine with any parts from OBJECTiVE. I tried the file you sent and the SEO worked exactly as expected.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:45:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Why-is-this-so-hard/m-p/120905#M63910</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph Wessel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-22T12:45:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is this so hard?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Why-is-this-so-hard/m-p/120906#M63911</link>
      <description>To break the edges just use a bit of virtual sand paper. If I understand your intent, I would place something at 45 degrees to the corner and use SEO to chamfer the edge. I find a very small one (1.5mm or less) usually does the trick, but then I like hard, square edges on my furniture. Perhaps in reaction to all the crap here in the states that's been hit with the round over bit.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:58:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Why-is-this-so-hard/m-p/120906#M63911</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-22T17:58:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

