<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Model Site curbing in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Model-Site-curbing/m-p/134167#M71667</link>
    <description>Try ArchiCURB (&lt;A href="http://archicadwarehouse.blogspot.com/" target="_blank"&gt;http://archicadwarehouse.blogspot.com/&lt;/A&gt;)!</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:17:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-28T23:17:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Model Site curbing</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Model-Site-curbing/m-p/134166#M71666</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Is there a better way to model site curbing than using multiple profiled beams. (Read pain in the rear). I have played with the shell tool but it doesn't seem to provide a way to run a profile along a multinode and multilevel path.  Using the beams seem to be just a labor intensive and dirty way to accomplish this. Attached is a view showing the partial result. Thanks.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/71567iCB204A7CEE5467F7/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="CURBING-1.jpg" title="CURBING-1.jpg" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 17:04:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Model-Site-curbing/m-p/134166#M71666</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T17:04:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Model Site curbing</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Model-Site-curbing/m-p/134167#M71667</link>
      <description>Try ArchiCURB (&lt;A href="http://archicadwarehouse.blogspot.com/" target="_blank"&gt;http://archicadwarehouse.blogspot.com/&lt;/A&gt;)!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:17:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Model-Site-curbing/m-p/134167#M71667</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-28T23:17:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Model Site curbing</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Model-Site-curbing/m-p/134168#M71668</link>
      <description>Thanks.  I'll try it and post results.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:38:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Model-Site-curbing/m-p/134168#M71668</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-28T23:38:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Model Site curbing</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Model-Site-curbing/m-p/134169#M71669</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;outpostarc wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a better way to model site curbing than using multiple profiled beams.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
Take a look at &lt;A href="http://www.encina.co.uk/objective.html" target="_blank"&gt;OBJECTiVE&lt;/A&gt;. Modelling rising, curved profiles is quite straightforward - see the attached image as an example.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6389iD082E0621B668804/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="kerb_158.jpg" title="kerb_158.jpg" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:42:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Model-Site-curbing/m-p/134169#M71669</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph Wessel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-29T16:42:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

