topic Re: Autodesk & 12 months cycle in Modeling

Autodesk & 12 months cycle

Rob — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 05:58:31 GMT

I have found this article just by a chance. It contemplates on a feasibility of 12-months cycle for a product development. I somehow believe that the decision of GS to 'copy' this strategy is doing more harm than good.

http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/10/24/ways-in-which-the-crash-could-be-good-for-autodesk/

Re: Autodesk & 12 months cycle

Anonymous — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:51:23 GMT

As some say here in Calif.
No S#!t
Bier

Re: Autodesk & 12 months cycle

Rob — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:48:10 GMT

that's what I thought some do there in California.

Re: Autodesk & 12 months cycle

Anonymous — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:49:25 GMT

Yep, that too.
Some here are even full of "it".
Anyway, thanks for posting that article.
Wondering how it will all play out as GS and Autoyouknowwho try to rake in the bucks from us next round?
Like one of my tag lines says; Speed kills quality.

Bier

Re: Autodesk & 12 months cycle

Djordje — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:08:09 GMT

Funny ... they say the same here ...

Mostly, an f word before the s word.

Speed does not know about quality.

Re: Autodesk & 12 months cycle

Anonymous — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 23:43:50 GMT

You know, Quality actually met Speed one day, but she did not like him.
They haven't talked since.
Bier

Re: Autodesk & 12 months cycle

Dwight — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:33:09 GMT

Quality preferred Cost because he spent money.

Re: Autodesk & 12 months cycle

vistasp — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:27:30 GMT

Dwight wrote:
Quality preferred Cost because he spent money.

Until the client decided to cut Cost down to size. Poor Quality; how she suffered...