<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Archicad 14 New Features in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154307#M83038</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;owen wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;............&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I remember when someone from GS came to our office years back and explained that at one version (think it was 7 .. please correct anyone with a better memory than I) they split their development team for the next 2 versions - i.e AC9 development was not developed following AC8 but in &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;parallel&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; in order to deliver features that could not be achieved &lt;B&gt;within a 12-month schedule.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

&lt;BR /&gt;
So then why, oh why did they then decide to switch to a 12-month cycle if they are so clearly incapable of sustaining development on a 12-month cycle? Why, when, as even last year clearly demonstrated, they are even  incapable of maintaining that 12 month cycle and ended up having to deliver the new version (AC13) 2-3 or months late anyway?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This question has been asked so many times on these forums, and it's not surprising that the quality of new AC releases began to degrade significantly with each new release as soon as they switched from their original 18-20 month cycle to this 12 month cycle which they now are on, for little other reason other than the fact that their main competitor (who d have the resources to reasonably sustain a 12-month cycle)  switched to a 12 month cycle, and oh yeah,  also because they can justify the  subscription charging format and ludicrous subscription revenue stream even when the payback for the poor souls that opt into it simply isn't there.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And now that the cat is out of the bag about how this subscription deal is such a scam for the poor customers that opt into it and don't get any value back on their money, they are instituting or adopting a  new license "rental" system to stem the flow of people opting out of subscription. Or most certainly the inevitable flow once this new version is released.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So the whole notion of using the 12-month cycle as an excuse to justify and explain the increasingly poorer and poorer releases each year, is just somewhat aggravating when you consider the fact that it was their ill-conceived decision based on poor motivations to begin with.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;owen wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
So it would not be without precedent that AC development was forked resulting in an intermediate release which is less than compelling feature wise.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Major work has been done under the hood in AC13&lt;/B&gt; and is probably continuing in AC14 (e.g they need to rewrite significant portions of code for OSX 64bit). &lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Oh yes, the old 'under-the-hood improvements deal. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
With the exception of the shift to 64-bit platform (which, as we all know was always an inevitability anyway, given the state of computing, and which they still couldn't even do a complete job on for the Mac people), I was always of the impression that most of the 'under-the-hood' improvements were primarily to make Teamwork 2.0 and their BIM server actually function correctly as opposed to improving the day-to-day quality of use of average users or even laying the groundwork for future improvements. I really don't get the impression that they are laying groundworks for anything - but I could be wrong. I guess we'll see when version 15 rolls around. Speaking of which......&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;owen wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I've always said maybe they need to have 1 'No New Features' release to really get the engine sorted without the distractions of new features. Maybe AC14 is it. &lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Actually they did do the whole 'No new Features' version back in version 9 even though that was really more  as a means to stabilizing the program and its development after the mess that was ArchiCAD 8.0 and the 8.1 that they had to release to correct it. But even then the idea was that future versions could have a firm foundation from which to have new features and a more stable gradual improvement. And to be fair, version 10 right after that did have quite a number of new features. Quite a number of half-baked ones as well (Complex profiler that didn't do curves springs to mind) but new ones nonetheless.&lt;BR /&gt;
The only problem is that since then, every other version has seemed to be pretty much a 'No new features' version. No significant new modelling tools . No significant new documentation tools, and only tools for high-end customers.&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;owen wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;OK .. but it better mean we start seeing really impressive new features in AC15 - stuff they couldn't do before because of limitations in the code and hardware.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I guess we have to wait another 12 months to find out ..&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

&lt;BR /&gt;
I wouldn't hold my breath, given their track record. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
 Not to mention what a risky and foolhardy strategy that is, as by the time they actually get to release their full bells-and-whistles feature-filled version in either AC15 and AC16, they might just find that more than half of their customer base has already bailed on them for the competition with no clear word or assurances from them as to their future plans or direction that this software is supposed to be headed towards. A little communication often goes a long way even in buying a little patience from your customer-base while to try to get your stuff together. No communication as is the case and the norm here only says 'No one is running the ship and if there is, they don't really care what you think, so keep your opinions to yourselves' - Which is the exact message they are sending to customers right now whether it's deliberate or not.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 08:52:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bricklyne Clarence</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-05-11T08:52:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154278#M83009</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;See what's on youtube!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.youtube.com/user/Archicad#g/c/5C1926DD91A70C7B" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.youtube.com/user/Archicad#g/c/5C1926DD91A70C7B" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&amp;lt;LINK_TEXT text=&amp;quot;http://www.youtube.com/user/Archicad#g/ ... DD91A70C7B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/user/Archicad#g/c/5C1926DD91A70C7B&amp;lt;/LINK_TEXT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;e&amp;gt;"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/S&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://www.youtube.com/user/Archicad#g/ ... DD91A70C7B"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/user/Archicad#g/c/5C1926DD91A70C7B&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Personally, not much in  it for me at all!   &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_evil.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:56:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154278#M83009</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Lee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T15:56:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154279#M83010</link>
      <description>Yep, no surprise àla TW2 exept TW2 for ac14 (again ) &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_wink.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
However two &lt;FONT size="84"&gt;minor&lt;/FONT&gt; intresting features:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
- shadows in opengl&lt;BR /&gt;
- Direct Dwg import&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
PS: Two features are still missing ..as for AC12 there were 12 'new' features &amp;amp; 13 for AC13 ...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 16:03:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154279#M83010</guid>
      <dc:creator>TMA_80</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T16:03:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154280#M83011</link>
      <description>I can't believe more than a third of the new features videos are showing how good Revit is.  This is a big let down to say the least.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Only useful feature for me is prefix and suffix of dimensions.  Wow what a great new innovative feature....Geez.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 18:00:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154280#M83011</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Lee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T18:00:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154281#M83012</link>
      <description>Is this an official release? If so, why is everyone so quiet?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 18:33:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154281#M83012</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T18:33:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154282#M83013</link>
      <description>Wow, that is hot news. Better make a copy of the movies before they get pulled down...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:19:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154282#M83013</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T19:19:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154283#M83014</link>
      <description>I'm still in shock...&lt;BR /&gt;
¿no mention to 64 bits for mac?&lt;BR /&gt;
I really hope that this leak is incomplete, we need more features in the final version.&lt;BR /&gt;
This new features don't make me happy, only two of them looks useful for my work.&lt;BR /&gt;
regards</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:56:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154283#M83014</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T19:56:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154284#M83015</link>
      <description>I am curious on IFC exchange improvement and hope for team work stability.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:58:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154284#M83015</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T19:58:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154285#M83016</link>
      <description>Not surprising, and as usual leaves one feeling underwhelmed. It will be interesting to watch this forum's reaction to these videos....especially those who have been questioning their subscriptions....&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
A nice fix for TW2 users is the 'pack &amp;amp; go' feature that makes the whole deal a lot more viable.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;Sad that there seems to be no "foundation level" fix that gives hope for the future....&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 23:08:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154285#M83016</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T23:08:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154286#M83017</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Krippahl wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Wow, that is hot news. Better make a copy of the movies before they get pulled down...&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Uh yeah .. looks like someone jumped the gun there  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_eek.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 23:23:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154286#M83017</guid>
      <dc:creator>owen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T23:23:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154287#M83018</link>
      <description>not sure if someone jumped the gun - actually it is more typical of the laissez-faire attitude GS seems to have adopted nowadays...I would not be surprised if it turned up in the mail tomorrow unannounced...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 23:52:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154287#M83018</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T23:52:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154288#M83019</link>
      <description>I just don't believe this !!&lt;BR /&gt;
This has to be a teaser. even so, I think GS has definitely picked the wrong videos !!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:31:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154288#M83019</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T00:31:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154289#M83020</link>
      <description>Those videos look pretty official.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And if they are as complete as they seem to be (meaning that we should not expect any more or other major new features outside what is shown), then...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
...I really don't know whether to cry or to laugh.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And not even remotely in a good way.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Of those supposed 'new' features, 3 are an extension (not improvement or upgrade) of an existing feature (TW2.0 - which, I guess wasn't completed when they released it in AC13 - surprise surprise), 3 are merely new ways to facilitate a user's ability to continue working and refining their models in other non-GS software, especially for tasks that AC still can't handle ( I still can NOT believe that a GS video is actually giving Revit products (MEP and Structure) free advertising, while advertising the fact that GS's own solutions (or lack thereof) for these respective functions are completely lacking. &lt;BR /&gt;
The remaining new features are merely marginal improvements to existing features (dimension texts???? smart schedules?? door window libraries?????) which cumulatively beg the question, as to why these features have never been improved in the program prior to this release.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The only hope ( and thin it is) for anyone still wondering whether or not this will be a worthwhile upgrade, is that those videos are not definitive and complete and that there are maybe one or 2 other really major features still being kept under wraps for release date. But it is a thin hope indeed, because chances are that that's all there's going to be for AC14.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
It's almost like they're literally trying to will people and push them away from buying or using future versions of ArchiCAD (and right into the arms of Revit, what with all that free advertising they gave them on an AC14 promotional video).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Unbelievable.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154289#M83020</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bricklyne Clarence</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T00:52:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154290#M83021</link>
      <description>AC13 and now 14 have focused on collaboration, and as these videos show AC14 is particularly focused on improving collaboration with consultants - i.e Revit Structure/MEP.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
They &lt;B&gt;had&lt;/B&gt; to do this ... their future depends on it. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Revit is a tidal wave threatening to decimate ArchiCAD - not because Revit Architecture is better (it is not .. yet) but because when you are fighting to work with a consultant team who are on Revit Structure/MEP/.. then it is very tempting to make your life easier and switch to a closer platform. Then throw in a contractor using Revit and the sole team member not on the same platform as everyone else comes under enormous pressure to demonstrate that their software is not causing problems for everyone else.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So Graphisoft are quite rightly heavily focused at the moment on making sure ArchiCAD can work the best it can with Revit. At least it shows they are not sticking their head in the sand on this one. Now if only their marketing team can make sure people hear about the effectiveness of these collaboration tools.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If they do not do this then ArchiCAD will not be around for much longer, so all those fancy new tools we want/need will be pointless.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I can understand many people will see absolutely nothing for them in AC14, but these things are critical for larger customers. As we have seen in recent posts - and from personal experiences for many of us - there are big ArchiCAD users seriously considering moving to Revit because of collaboration issues. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That is the real threat to ArchiCAD's future ... not a better stair tool (as much as I want it).</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 01:12:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154290#M83021</guid>
      <dc:creator>owen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T01:12:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154291#M83022</link>
      <description>It still seems like bad marketing for sure.  If you have to go to so much trouble to convert files to Revit MEP and structure - and if you are a big company, the first question that pops up would be Why not just use Revit Architecture???  If Revit releases a service pack - how long does it take for GS to release a compatible exporter?  Do you have to wait till next year? Will GS guarantee 100% compatiblity and error free translation?  If I am an architect working on a huge project with consultants using Revit MEP and Structure, do I really want this added liability to deal with?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
BTW, the brief videos showcasing Revit MEP and Structure look like a snap!  Wonder how good Revit Arch is...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 02:56:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154291#M83022</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Lee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T02:56:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154292#M83023</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;owen wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;AC13 and now 14 have focused on collaboration, and as these videos show AC14 is particularly focused on improving collaboration with consultants - i.e Revit Structure/MEP.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;They &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/S&gt;had&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; to do this ... their future depends on it. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
..............&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If they do not do this then ArchiCAD will not be around for much longer, so all those fancy new tools we want/need will be pointless.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I can understand many people will see absolutely nothing for them in AC14, but these things are critical for larger customers. As we have seen in recent posts - and from personal experiences for many of us - there are big ArchiCAD users seriously considering moving to Revit because of collaboration issues. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That is the real threat to ArchiCAD's future ... not a better stair tool (as much as I want it).&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

&lt;BR /&gt;
So if they're not going to improve or enhance the core tool-set of AC (core tools, not "fancy", as you put it), at the expense of improving collaborative capabilities with their rival software's complementary tools, then why, pray tell, should an ArchiCAD user bother spending more money on them when those tools are not only available in their rival's software ( which have no collaboration issues), but are also superior in many cases, and are perpetually improving with each release.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If GS are not going to bother giving their customers a more intuitive way of making parametric doors and windows, for example (nothing fancy about that), without having to write hundreds of lines of GDL code, because they (GS) have to make sure that users will be able to export their models to Revit Structure or Revit MEP, why not just switch to Revit Architecture which already has a (more or less,) intuitive and graphical parametric object maker, already?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You argument is basically this, in a nutshell,&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt; "I know, as a manufacturer,  I provide an inferior car, or product, but rather than improving it, I think it's better to ensure that my customers are able to get their cars to my rival's garage to get it fixed or to buy missing parts and get better service, that they can't get from me, but which they really should by all rights be expecting from my shop, out of the box." &lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In most other cases in the business world, that would be considered a ludicrous business model, and just plain crazy.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I dare say, that GS wouldn't find themselves in this position of having to 'fight for their survival' had they been actually listening (and responding) to their day-to-day users, for the last 4 or 5 versions. Their biggest marketing asset has always been the users who not only recommend the product to other prospective buyers and colleagues but also through their works and designs. Not the re-sellers, and certainly not the marketing department at GSHQ. The users.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Instead they have spent the better part of the last couple of versions demonstrating exactly why investing in this software or  hoping for better improvements are a bad baaaad investment, and ushering legions of users to Autodesk faster that Autodesk's own marketing department can.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I understand the point you're trying to make, and in better circumstances, I would probably also be trying to defend GS's decisions here as well. But given what has been their apparent tone-deaf approach to dealing with their  (small) customers, who, at this point are nothing better than reliable cash-cows for them, it all just seems rather unpalatable.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 02:58:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154292#M83023</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bricklyne Clarence</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T02:58:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154293#M83024</link>
      <description>I have to agree with your post, Clarence.&lt;BR /&gt;
May I also speculate that single users who were disenfranchised with 13 and the lack on extra features (for them) will feel totally jilted this time round.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Owen I think the problem for GS is that they need to be doing "both/and" not just "either/or"...if you get my drift. &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;AC is so seriously behind in so many areas they cannot afford to just look at interoperability...&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 03:09:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154293#M83024</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T03:09:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154294#M83025</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Dennis wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;It still seems like bad marketing for sure.  If you have to go to so much trouble to convert files to Revit MEP and structure - and if you are a big company, the first question that pops up would be Why not just use Revit Architecture???&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

.....it seems like that would be the most logical question anyone would ask.&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Dennis wrote:&lt;BR /&gt; If Revit releases a service pack - how long does it take for GS to release a compatible exporter?  Do you have to wait till next year? Will GS guarantee 100% compatiblity and error free translation?  If I am an architect working on a huge project with consultants using Revit MEP and Structure, do I really want this added liability to deal with?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

I hadn't even thought of updates, and compatibility issues. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And let's not forget how GS has enough issues with third party plugins in their own house, keeping up to date and compatible with each AC release, and on both sides of the Mac/PC divide. Or the fact that Autodesk has never exhibited great enthusiasm for the IFC format, and wouldn't feel compelled to keep up with the latest protocols if they felt it might hurt their bottom-line or their strategy of drawing more users into the DWG/DXF/RVT fold.&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Dennis wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;BTW, the brief videos showcasing Revit MEP and Structure look like a snap!  Wonder how good Revit Arch is...&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

........and ladies and gentlemen, Graphisoft marketing of Autodesk products in action.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 03:17:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154294#M83025</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bricklyne Clarence</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T03:17:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154295#M83026</link>
      <description>Owen wrote:"They had to do this ... their future depends on it"&lt;BR /&gt;
I think your right. I get that for the long haul goal,&lt;BR /&gt;
even if 14 has nothing for me.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If nothing else significant is in 14, but what appears to be an authentic leak, then micro small guys like me are paying for the very survival of GS's &lt;BR /&gt;
immediate future.&lt;BR /&gt;
I'm one of the sheep that is on subscription so I'll give them till 15 to reconnect with the caboose, then I'll cut loose.&lt;BR /&gt;
lec</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 03:34:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154295#M83026</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T03:34:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154296#M83027</link>
      <description>lec your signature sums up what could be a sorry situation for single users....</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 04:15:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154296#M83027</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T04:15:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154297#M83028</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;owen wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;AC13 and now 14 have focused on collaboration, and as these videos show AC14 is particularly focused on improving collaboration with consultants - i.e Revit Structure/MEP.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
They &lt;B&gt;had&lt;/B&gt; to do this ... their future depends on it. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Revit is a tidal wave threatening to decimate ArchiCAD - not because Revit Architecture is better (it is not .. yet) but because when you are fighting to work with a consultant team who are on Revit Structure/MEP/.. then it is very tempting to make your life easier and switch to a closer platform. Then throw in a contractor using Revit and the sole team member not on the same platform as everyone else comes under enormous pressure to demonstrate that their software is not causing problems for everyone else.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So Graphisoft are quite rightly heavily focused at the moment on making sure ArchiCAD can work the best it can with Revit. At least it shows they are not sticking their head in the sand on this one. Now if only their marketing team can make sure people hear about the effectiveness of these collaboration tools.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If they do not do this then ArchiCAD will not be around for much longer, so all those fancy new tools we want/need will be pointless.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I can understand many people will see absolutely nothing for them in AC14, but these things are critical for larger customers. As we have seen in recent posts - and from personal experiences for many of us - there are big ArchiCAD users seriously considering moving to Revit because of collaboration issues. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That is the real threat to ArchiCAD's future ... not a better stair tool (as much as I want it).&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

I agree with that 100%.&lt;BR /&gt;
Unfortunately those Autodesk shills cry louder here.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 05:27:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154297#M83028</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T05:27:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

