<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Archicad 14 New Features in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154367#M83098</link>
    <description>long post....&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I waited some time to post, just until AC14 was released or announced, to see what new features came out with it; and now it was time.&lt;BR /&gt;
I've used AC since V6, in every kind and size of project; and with its evolution, my knowledge of the software has also increased.&lt;BR /&gt;
I have also used Revit Architecture, not as much as AC, but enough to give a valuable opinion/comparison between them; and as others have stated, AC is superior, but now just barely.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The MAIN reason -of course, there are others which I'll try to mention- I have not migrated fully to Revit is because of the AC work paradigm. What do I mean?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
For starters, let me say that I consider AC to be about 5 years behind Revit in terms of general and parametric modeling, and I guess we all know that. The easy (although far from complete) modeling tools in Revit and parametric constrains and creation environment make it so easy to create/extend your object library, and the fact that they kind of work like blocks that get saved with the project is a real lifesaver. Maybe that's why AC brought the refined library management in AC13, sort of their own in-place families. Revit modeling and libraries (families, as they are called) are evolving. An example of this would be the change in a lot of libraries that now sport an "instance parameter" structure, which means that each library part may have different settings in its parameters, and still can be scheduled easily. Some time ago, most library parts came with "type parameter" settings, like the old AC libraries worked. There's an advantage to this: if you now you're going to use the same window all over the place, you use a "type parameter", and really use the same window (settings and all) in the project. AC lacks real cloning of elements.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But (and it is a BIG BUT) on the other hand, AC is about 5 years AHEAD of Revit in the model-work-documentation paradigm. The way model-&amp;gt;layers.combos/views-&amp;gt;layouts-&amp;gt;publish work is in my opinion THE way BIM should work. Let me bring up some light onto this. Revit says it doesn't use layers. Well... it doesn't... it uses categories. SAME DIFFERENCE. In fact, I find these categories restrictive; and although they do help you to keep your model organized (unless you create a toilet using a door template and it gets categorized as a door, which I don't see happening), its not easy to, for example, have different dimension "categories", say one for general dimensions, or other for detail dimensions. Layers/layers combos are a better approach to these documentation problems, and when used in combination with the cloned VIEWS, it's just unbeatable.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Now... there is no real difference in Revit between the model and views (or project map and view map). You just have your model database (which is why most things in Revit get generated on the fly) and then you create views from it. But then, plans are also a view, and so are sections and elevations, even schedules!!!; and while this might help the parametric engine, it just makes a mess when it comes to multiple views because in Revit you can only place a view on a sheet (layout) one time. You want it somewhere else? Duplicate it/clone it to get it; and take caution if you want some annotations in your duplicated view, as dimensions and annotations live in viewsANDcategories (yes, together, because if you delete an already annotated view, you loose your dimensions; while in AC your data is data on the model, and its visibility is controlled by layers, if you delete a certain view from the view map, you don't delete the data, just the combination of layers and scale that form the view itself). And your "project map" which is the same as your "view map" starts to grow as views are needed. Suppose you need the same plan on different scales and layout sizes: in Revit, your project/view map would be big, just to do this. In AC, you have ONE project map, where all model and marker elements live, and then in the view map you combine your layers to generate as many views as you need/want, and place them anywhere you want, as many times as you want. Yes... the title references need to be checked, I'll give you that, but I prefer  to select in sections/elevations which view it marker should point to, than to have the same section/elevation repeated in my model map several times just because I need different scale/categories/etc combinations.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This flexibility in the documentation is what makes AC better than Revit (for instance, Revit can't place dimensions on 3d views, like in 3d documents in AC)...... but....... should Autodesk ever implement the same model.map-&amp;gt;view.map-&amp;gt;sheet.map-&amp;gt;publish paradigm into Revit, it would just beat AC hands down. And sadly... it will, now that we know the "new" features of AC14. It's really a shame. GS may be preparing a major release for AC15, all right... but there goes another year that the competition will gain in terms of user input, and I may say, a year that many will use to learn other platforms (not exclusively Revit), like I'm currently doing extending my knowledge of Revit, preparing to switch over.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
There are other things that make AC and Revit alike and different at the same time. Two tools as example: slabs and roofs, specifically editing and slopes for each. When using slabs, in Revit you enter a drafting mode where you define the edges of your polygon, and then the model is generated based on this polygon. If you need to edit it, you have to enter the sketch mode to do it. In AC, you edit the polygon and model at the same time, and is a real time saver. And the tools you have on the pet palette are just great (although I would prefer a pie menu, a la maya, instead of a pet palette). But then along comes Revit with the split surface functionality: you have one and only one slab, but any polygon can be split and assigned different materials. In AC you either use two slabs, or one for the general bottom and thinner ones to define upper splits. With roofs is almost the same thing, but in AC is hard to get slopes right (even with the adjust angle option in the pet palette). In Revit you can define an arrow (yes... a simple arrow) to set start and end point of slope, and set start and top levels based on that arrow! Come on!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But still... I like better the way you work with AC creation and editing tools (virtual trace is heaven!!!). They are much faster than Revit's, but that competition get's leveled with Revit's parametric engine. In Revit it's slower to make edits, but get carried through out the model and documents faster; in AC is the other way around.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If GS wants to improve AC, in my opinion they should look into:&lt;BR /&gt;
1. Database parametric engine: In Revit, you really have live views of a single database. If you have several views open and select a door in one of them, it gets selected in other views, and changes are realtime. In AC, you may have a plan view and a section view opem, but they are not live and connected, and get updated only after you click on the other view. Even worse: AC bases almost everything on the floor plan, so while in Revit you click in a section view and the software responds like "the user selected a door", AC works like "the user has clicked a point in a section view, in the coordinate x=2 y=1.8, which based on the floor plan and elevation data, corresponds to an area enclosed by a door, so, the user has clicked on a door: select it".&lt;BR /&gt;
2. Remove the 80's thinking about software: if sketchup and revit can make components and families without programming knowledge, why AC can't do it?&lt;BR /&gt;
3. Improve the model-&amp;gt;view-&amp;gt;layout-&amp;gt;publish work model. It is a great strength of the software: take advantage of it.&lt;BR /&gt;
4. GUI. AC has a GUI that you HAVE to learn. Once you get it, you get it; but if you analize it... well... you'll see it lacks a lot. The features about the work environment are awesome. Export and import workspaces, and set them with a few clicks is FANTASTIC!. But the rest of the GUI is just confusing, in the sense that it lacks consistency. I mean, open up and compare the settings window for walls, doors, columns, slabs, zones, dimensions, levels, text, lines, grids, etc... and you'll see. Yes... there are some elements of consistency, but in general you have to dig into every window to know where a parameter is. Revit's GUI is not that good either, but the simplistic manner in which it shows properties (like a spreadsheet), makes it easy to learn, instead of learning a different window for each tool. You know what I mean.&lt;BR /&gt;
5. Listen to the userbase/clients. You may come up with ideas to implement on the software, based on technology and new standards. That just gets you halfway. The userbase/clients is where the software gets tested and used in real life situations. That's the other half that's missing. Autodesk already learned this lesson. Just look at the complete transformation they're doing with 3ds max.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
All this of course sounds like ArchiCAD Utopia. It is. I know it would require great effort and maybe a complete rewrite of the software. My guess is that it won't happen. And looking at AC14 "new" features... well....&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Not all is lost. There are some things that can be improved right now, like removing the redundant updating of drawings (if you have the same section view in several layouts and gets updated, it will update every time you open one of those layouts: so update the view once, on the viewmap level, and make the update on layouts instant); or small improvements like better editing paradigm than a pet palette or adding a typing search filter to... everything (like how about hit ctrl-L and start typing to filter some layers that have "arch" on it?, because the current filtering is kind of useless)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
One thing is certain: people using AC are starting to really look into Revit as a better option for BIM. I guess.... its time to go with the flow.........&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
best regards. &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_smile.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_smile.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 21:17:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sinceV6</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-05-14T21:17:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154278#M83009</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;R&gt;See what's on youtube!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.youtube.com/user/Archicad#g/c/5C1926DD91A70C7B" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.youtube.com/user/Archicad#g/c/5C1926DD91A70C7B" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&amp;lt;LINK_TEXT text=&amp;quot;http://www.youtube.com/user/Archicad#g/ ... DD91A70C7B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/user/Archicad#g/c/5C1926DD91A70C7B&amp;lt;/LINK_TEXT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;e&amp;gt;"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/S&gt;&lt;LINK_TEXT text="http://www.youtube.com/user/Archicad#g/ ... DD91A70C7B"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/user/Archicad#g/c/5C1926DD91A70C7B&lt;/LINK_TEXT&gt;&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Personally, not much in  it for me at all!   &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_evil.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;&lt;/R&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:56:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154278#M83009</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Lee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T15:56:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154279#M83010</link>
      <description>Yep, no surprise àla TW2 exept TW2 for ac14 (again ) &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_wink.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
However two &lt;FONT size="84"&gt;minor&lt;/FONT&gt; intresting features:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
- shadows in opengl&lt;BR /&gt;
- Direct Dwg import&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
PS: Two features are still missing ..as for AC12 there were 12 'new' features &amp;amp; 13 for AC13 ...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 16:03:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154279#M83010</guid>
      <dc:creator>TMA_80</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T16:03:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154280#M83011</link>
      <description>I can't believe more than a third of the new features videos are showing how good Revit is.  This is a big let down to say the least.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Only useful feature for me is prefix and suffix of dimensions.  Wow what a great new innovative feature....Geez.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 18:00:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154280#M83011</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Lee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T18:00:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154281#M83012</link>
      <description>Is this an official release? If so, why is everyone so quiet?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 18:33:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154281#M83012</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T18:33:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154282#M83013</link>
      <description>Wow, that is hot news. Better make a copy of the movies before they get pulled down...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:19:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154282#M83013</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T19:19:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154283#M83014</link>
      <description>I'm still in shock...&lt;BR /&gt;
¿no mention to 64 bits for mac?&lt;BR /&gt;
I really hope that this leak is incomplete, we need more features in the final version.&lt;BR /&gt;
This new features don't make me happy, only two of them looks useful for my work.&lt;BR /&gt;
regards</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:56:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154283#M83014</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T19:56:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154284#M83015</link>
      <description>I am curious on IFC exchange improvement and hope for team work stability.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:58:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154284#M83015</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T19:58:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154285#M83016</link>
      <description>Not surprising, and as usual leaves one feeling underwhelmed. It will be interesting to watch this forum's reaction to these videos....especially those who have been questioning their subscriptions....&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
A nice fix for TW2 users is the 'pack &amp;amp; go' feature that makes the whole deal a lot more viable.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;Sad that there seems to be no "foundation level" fix that gives hope for the future....&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 23:08:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154285#M83016</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T23:08:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154286#M83017</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Krippahl wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Wow, that is hot news. Better make a copy of the movies before they get pulled down...&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Uh yeah .. looks like someone jumped the gun there  &lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_eek.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 23:23:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154286#M83017</guid>
      <dc:creator>owen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T23:23:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154287#M83018</link>
      <description>not sure if someone jumped the gun - actually it is more typical of the laissez-faire attitude GS seems to have adopted nowadays...I would not be surprised if it turned up in the mail tomorrow unannounced...</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 23:52:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154287#M83018</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-10T23:52:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154288#M83019</link>
      <description>I just don't believe this !!&lt;BR /&gt;
This has to be a teaser. even so, I think GS has definitely picked the wrong videos !!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:31:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154288#M83019</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T00:31:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154289#M83020</link>
      <description>Those videos look pretty official.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And if they are as complete as they seem to be (meaning that we should not expect any more or other major new features outside what is shown), then...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
...I really don't know whether to cry or to laugh.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And not even remotely in a good way.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Of those supposed 'new' features, 3 are an extension (not improvement or upgrade) of an existing feature (TW2.0 - which, I guess wasn't completed when they released it in AC13 - surprise surprise), 3 are merely new ways to facilitate a user's ability to continue working and refining their models in other non-GS software, especially for tasks that AC still can't handle ( I still can NOT believe that a GS video is actually giving Revit products (MEP and Structure) free advertising, while advertising the fact that GS's own solutions (or lack thereof) for these respective functions are completely lacking. &lt;BR /&gt;
The remaining new features are merely marginal improvements to existing features (dimension texts???? smart schedules?? door window libraries?????) which cumulatively beg the question, as to why these features have never been improved in the program prior to this release.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The only hope ( and thin it is) for anyone still wondering whether or not this will be a worthwhile upgrade, is that those videos are not definitive and complete and that there are maybe one or 2 other really major features still being kept under wraps for release date. But it is a thin hope indeed, because chances are that that's all there's going to be for AC14.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
It's almost like they're literally trying to will people and push them away from buying or using future versions of ArchiCAD (and right into the arms of Revit, what with all that free advertising they gave them on an AC14 promotional video).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Unbelievable.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154289#M83020</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bricklyne Clarence</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T00:52:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154290#M83021</link>
      <description>AC13 and now 14 have focused on collaboration, and as these videos show AC14 is particularly focused on improving collaboration with consultants - i.e Revit Structure/MEP.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
They &lt;B&gt;had&lt;/B&gt; to do this ... their future depends on it. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Revit is a tidal wave threatening to decimate ArchiCAD - not because Revit Architecture is better (it is not .. yet) but because when you are fighting to work with a consultant team who are on Revit Structure/MEP/.. then it is very tempting to make your life easier and switch to a closer platform. Then throw in a contractor using Revit and the sole team member not on the same platform as everyone else comes under enormous pressure to demonstrate that their software is not causing problems for everyone else.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So Graphisoft are quite rightly heavily focused at the moment on making sure ArchiCAD can work the best it can with Revit. At least it shows they are not sticking their head in the sand on this one. Now if only their marketing team can make sure people hear about the effectiveness of these collaboration tools.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If they do not do this then ArchiCAD will not be around for much longer, so all those fancy new tools we want/need will be pointless.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I can understand many people will see absolutely nothing for them in AC14, but these things are critical for larger customers. As we have seen in recent posts - and from personal experiences for many of us - there are big ArchiCAD users seriously considering moving to Revit because of collaboration issues. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That is the real threat to ArchiCAD's future ... not a better stair tool (as much as I want it).</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 01:12:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154290#M83021</guid>
      <dc:creator>owen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T01:12:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154291#M83022</link>
      <description>It still seems like bad marketing for sure.  If you have to go to so much trouble to convert files to Revit MEP and structure - and if you are a big company, the first question that pops up would be Why not just use Revit Architecture???  If Revit releases a service pack - how long does it take for GS to release a compatible exporter?  Do you have to wait till next year? Will GS guarantee 100% compatiblity and error free translation?  If I am an architect working on a huge project with consultants using Revit MEP and Structure, do I really want this added liability to deal with?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
BTW, the brief videos showcasing Revit MEP and Structure look like a snap!  Wonder how good Revit Arch is...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 02:56:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154291#M83022</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Lee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T02:56:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154292#M83023</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;owen wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;AC13 and now 14 have focused on collaboration, and as these videos show AC14 is particularly focused on improving collaboration with consultants - i.e Revit Structure/MEP.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;They &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/S&gt;had&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; to do this ... their future depends on it. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
..............&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If they do not do this then ArchiCAD will not be around for much longer, so all those fancy new tools we want/need will be pointless.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I can understand many people will see absolutely nothing for them in AC14, but these things are critical for larger customers. As we have seen in recent posts - and from personal experiences for many of us - there are big ArchiCAD users seriously considering moving to Revit because of collaboration issues. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That is the real threat to ArchiCAD's future ... not a better stair tool (as much as I want it).&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

&lt;BR /&gt;
So if they're not going to improve or enhance the core tool-set of AC (core tools, not "fancy", as you put it), at the expense of improving collaborative capabilities with their rival software's complementary tools, then why, pray tell, should an ArchiCAD user bother spending more money on them when those tools are not only available in their rival's software ( which have no collaboration issues), but are also superior in many cases, and are perpetually improving with each release.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If GS are not going to bother giving their customers a more intuitive way of making parametric doors and windows, for example (nothing fancy about that), without having to write hundreds of lines of GDL code, because they (GS) have to make sure that users will be able to export their models to Revit Structure or Revit MEP, why not just switch to Revit Architecture which already has a (more or less,) intuitive and graphical parametric object maker, already?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You argument is basically this, in a nutshell,&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt; "I know, as a manufacturer,  I provide an inferior car, or product, but rather than improving it, I think it's better to ensure that my customers are able to get their cars to my rival's garage to get it fixed or to buy missing parts and get better service, that they can't get from me, but which they really should by all rights be expecting from my shop, out of the box." &lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In most other cases in the business world, that would be considered a ludicrous business model, and just plain crazy.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I dare say, that GS wouldn't find themselves in this position of having to 'fight for their survival' had they been actually listening (and responding) to their day-to-day users, for the last 4 or 5 versions. Their biggest marketing asset has always been the users who not only recommend the product to other prospective buyers and colleagues but also through their works and designs. Not the re-sellers, and certainly not the marketing department at GSHQ. The users.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Instead they have spent the better part of the last couple of versions demonstrating exactly why investing in this software or  hoping for better improvements are a bad baaaad investment, and ushering legions of users to Autodesk faster that Autodesk's own marketing department can.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I understand the point you're trying to make, and in better circumstances, I would probably also be trying to defend GS's decisions here as well. But given what has been their apparent tone-deaf approach to dealing with their  (small) customers, who, at this point are nothing better than reliable cash-cows for them, it all just seems rather unpalatable.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 02:58:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154292#M83023</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bricklyne Clarence</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T02:58:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154293#M83024</link>
      <description>I have to agree with your post, Clarence.&lt;BR /&gt;
May I also speculate that single users who were disenfranchised with 13 and the lack on extra features (for them) will feel totally jilted this time round.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Owen I think the problem for GS is that they need to be doing "both/and" not just "either/or"...if you get my drift. &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;AC is so seriously behind in so many areas they cannot afford to just look at interoperability...&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 03:09:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154293#M83024</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T03:09:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154294#M83025</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Dennis wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;It still seems like bad marketing for sure.  If you have to go to so much trouble to convert files to Revit MEP and structure - and if you are a big company, the first question that pops up would be Why not just use Revit Architecture???&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

.....it seems like that would be the most logical question anyone would ask.&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Dennis wrote:&lt;BR /&gt; If Revit releases a service pack - how long does it take for GS to release a compatible exporter?  Do you have to wait till next year? Will GS guarantee 100% compatiblity and error free translation?  If I am an architect working on a huge project with consultants using Revit MEP and Structure, do I really want this added liability to deal with?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

I hadn't even thought of updates, and compatibility issues. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And let's not forget how GS has enough issues with third party plugins in their own house, keeping up to date and compatible with each AC release, and on both sides of the Mac/PC divide. Or the fact that Autodesk has never exhibited great enthusiasm for the IFC format, and wouldn't feel compelled to keep up with the latest protocols if they felt it might hurt their bottom-line or their strategy of drawing more users into the DWG/DXF/RVT fold.&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Dennis wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;BTW, the brief videos showcasing Revit MEP and Structure look like a snap!  Wonder how good Revit Arch is...&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

........and ladies and gentlemen, Graphisoft marketing of Autodesk products in action.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 03:17:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154294#M83025</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bricklyne Clarence</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T03:17:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154295#M83026</link>
      <description>Owen wrote:"They had to do this ... their future depends on it"&lt;BR /&gt;
I think your right. I get that for the long haul goal,&lt;BR /&gt;
even if 14 has nothing for me.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If nothing else significant is in 14, but what appears to be an authentic leak, then micro small guys like me are paying for the very survival of GS's &lt;BR /&gt;
immediate future.&lt;BR /&gt;
I'm one of the sheep that is on subscription so I'll give them till 15 to reconnect with the caboose, then I'll cut loose.&lt;BR /&gt;
lec</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 03:34:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154295#M83026</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T03:34:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154296#M83027</link>
      <description>lec your signature sums up what could be a sorry situation for single users....</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 04:15:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154296#M83027</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T04:15:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Archicad 14 New Features</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154297#M83028</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;owen wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;AC13 and now 14 have focused on collaboration, and as these videos show AC14 is particularly focused on improving collaboration with consultants - i.e Revit Structure/MEP.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
They &lt;B&gt;had&lt;/B&gt; to do this ... their future depends on it. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Revit is a tidal wave threatening to decimate ArchiCAD - not because Revit Architecture is better (it is not .. yet) but because when you are fighting to work with a consultant team who are on Revit Structure/MEP/.. then it is very tempting to make your life easier and switch to a closer platform. Then throw in a contractor using Revit and the sole team member not on the same platform as everyone else comes under enormous pressure to demonstrate that their software is not causing problems for everyone else.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So Graphisoft are quite rightly heavily focused at the moment on making sure ArchiCAD can work the best it can with Revit. At least it shows they are not sticking their head in the sand on this one. Now if only their marketing team can make sure people hear about the effectiveness of these collaboration tools.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If they do not do this then ArchiCAD will not be around for much longer, so all those fancy new tools we want/need will be pointless.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I can understand many people will see absolutely nothing for them in AC14, but these things are critical for larger customers. As we have seen in recent posts - and from personal experiences for many of us - there are big ArchiCAD users seriously considering moving to Revit because of collaboration issues. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That is the real threat to ArchiCAD's future ... not a better stair tool (as much as I want it).&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

I agree with that 100%.&lt;BR /&gt;
Unfortunately those Autodesk shills cry louder here.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 05:27:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Archicad-14-New-Features/m-p/154297#M83028</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-11T05:27:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

