<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Reflected Ceiling Plans in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Reflected-Ceiling-Plans/m-p/158132#M85299</link>
    <description>Could you post an example of the things you require in a RCP that AC can't do at the moment? Graphisoft would need to know what the shortcomings are in order to improve it in the future, and I suspect not everyone's requirements around the world are the same.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 23:34:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-08-11T23:34:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Reflected Ceiling Plans</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Reflected-Ceiling-Plans/m-p/158130#M85297</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Archicad's inability to generate model based RCP's is really bothering me today. I'm working on a project with roof curvature and exposed rafters, so the customary workarounds are not going to cut it. I have to believe that folks in other firms have similar issues with this lack of functionality... &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So please, Graphisoft, make this happen.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The 3D workflow improvements in AC15 are appreciated, the new bells and whistles amusing, but at the end of the day I still have to print drawings on paper. To this end we need a complete toolbox to take our globally coordinated 3D data into accurate 2D documentation, and a means of model generated ceiling plans would be a great step in that direction.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 12:48:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Reflected-Ceiling-Plans/m-p/158130#M85297</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-23T12:48:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Reflected Ceiling Plans</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Reflected-Ceiling-Plans/m-p/158131#M85298</link>
      <description>Have you tried creating a 3D document of the RC by using cut planes and rearranging the camera?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:58:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Reflected-Ceiling-Plans/m-p/158131#M85298</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eduardo Rolon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-11T21:58:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Reflected Ceiling Plans</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Reflected-Ceiling-Plans/m-p/158132#M85299</link>
      <description>Could you post an example of the things you require in a RCP that AC can't do at the moment? Graphisoft would need to know what the shortcomings are in order to improve it in the future, and I suspect not everyone's requirements around the world are the same.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 23:34:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Reflected-Ceiling-Plans/m-p/158132#M85299</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-11T23:34:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

