<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Beam in Elevation in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Beam-in-Elevation/m-p/163274#M88225</link>
    <description>David this is a section of that beam.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/68129iA1AD3EC768AAB97D/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="beam_section.png" title="beam_section.png" /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:15:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-27T12:15:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Beam in Elevation</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Beam-in-Elevation/m-p/163272#M88223</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Is there a way to simplify the line work on this beam in elevation?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/68114iA9C09DA3A0640034/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="beam.png" title="beam.png" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 10:29:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Beam-in-Elevation/m-p/163272#M88223</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-26T10:29:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Beam in Elevation</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Beam-in-Elevation/m-p/163273#M88224</link>
      <description>What's the cross section?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:40:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Beam-in-Elevation/m-p/163273#M88224</guid>
      <dc:creator>David Shorter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-27T09:40:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Beam in Elevation</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Beam-in-Elevation/m-p/163274#M88225</link>
      <description>David this is a section of that beam.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/68129iA1AD3EC768AAB97D/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="beam_section.png" title="beam_section.png" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:15:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Beam-in-Elevation/m-p/163274#M88225</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-27T12:15:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Beam in Elevation</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Beam-in-Elevation/m-p/163275#M88226</link>
      <description>OK - bear with me here.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That is a beam from neverland.  Steel performs in a manner that guides all stock beams to have less steel in the webs and more steel in the flanges.  My first suggestion is that if this is a design project use a standard profile for that beam, the small curves in your beam are creating multiple lines in elevation.  Using a stock Orthogonally built beam will eliminate those extra lines.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What is very cool in AC is that you have the option of loading country specific steel beam catalogs directly into AC.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The normal solution to your design problem is to use two back to back "C" channels (or flat stock)  welded with flat plates to get that cross section.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 20:16:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Beam-in-Elevation/m-p/163275#M88226</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-08T20:16:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

