<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Load vs Nonload bearing in Modeling</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Load-vs-Nonload-bearing/m-p/179105#M97357</link>
    <description>The terms refer to an elements Structural Loading. A column is load bearing, i.e. carries the building's structural loading whereas an interior partition may not.&lt;BR /&gt;
HTH</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 14:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Erika Epstein</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-03T14:31:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Load vs Nonload bearing</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Load-vs-Nonload-bearing/m-p/179104#M97356</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I hear about these two names and I don't know what is the difference between load/non load bearing. Where is used?&lt;BR /&gt;
Can someone explain me? And if it's possible with some screenshots. &lt;BR /&gt;
Many thanks.&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 12:22:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Load-vs-Nonload-bearing/m-p/179104#M97356</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-03T12:22:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load vs Nonload bearing</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Load-vs-Nonload-bearing/m-p/179105#M97357</link>
      <description>The terms refer to an elements Structural Loading. A column is load bearing, i.e. carries the building's structural loading whereas an interior partition may not.&lt;BR /&gt;
HTH</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 14:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Load-vs-Nonload-bearing/m-p/179105#M97357</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erika Epstein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-03T14:31:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load vs Nonload bearing</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Load-vs-Nonload-bearing/m-p/179106#M97358</link>
      <description>All 3D elements are load bearing (including shell and morph; doors and windows)? &lt;BR /&gt;
Can a load bearing element transform in a non load bearing and vice-versa?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:03:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Load-vs-Nonload-bearing/m-p/179106#M97358</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-03T16:03:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load vs Nonload bearing</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Load-vs-Nonload-bearing/m-p/179107#M97359</link>
      <description>No, think of it as  a structural Engineer would view it. They typically define a structurally siginificant element as one that is part of the building's structural system; what keeps it standing up. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
While most columns tend to be load-bearing, i.e., they factor in how a building stands up, we architects have been known to place one that is &lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/S&gt;decorative&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
An example of gray area here is how railings are handled. We think of them as structural whereas structural engineers only verify that they will be strong enough to keep people from knocking them down per codes and may provide connection detailing. To engineers, though, they aren't part of the building's structural system. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Your structural engineer can review the designation(s) with you, a good idea for all the 'gray' areas on projects.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
HTH</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 20:40:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Load-vs-Nonload-bearing/m-p/179107#M97359</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erika Epstein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-03T20:40:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load vs Nonload bearing</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Load-vs-Nonload-bearing/m-p/179108#M97360</link>
      <description>Very abbreviated. &lt;BR /&gt;
You can also think of load bearing as an element of the building that is carrying weight/forces on a path that at least eventually connects to the earth no mater how circuitously this may happen.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 02:43:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Load-vs-Nonload-bearing/m-p/179108#M97360</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-04T02:43:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load vs Nonload bearing</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Load-vs-Nonload-bearing/m-p/179109#M97361</link>
      <description>In the office where I working for, when I must send a project to an structural engineer, always I saved in DWG type all plans. &lt;BR /&gt;
Many thanks for explanations.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 11:13:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Modeling/Load-vs-Nonload-bearing/m-p/179109#M97361</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-04T11:13:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

