topic Re: AC8.1 -> PM9 = No Anno Fills in Documentation

AC8.1 -> PM9 = No Anno Fills

Anonymous — Mon, 22 May 2023 22:03:17 GMT

We have an AC3.1 model linked to a PM9 layout book. All the label arrow heads, section arrows, and elevation dimension symbols are printing hollow. Is there a switch for this, or is this a problem between AC8.1 and PM9?

Re: AC8.1 -> PM9 = No Anno Fills

__archiben — Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:21:05 GMT

Jay wrote:
We have an AC3.1 model linked to a PM9 layout book. All the label arrow heads, section arrows, and elevation dimension symbols are printing hollow. Is there a switch for this, or is this a problem between AC8.1 and PM9?

AC 3.1 or 8.1 ?!?!?!

i take it that fills generally are printing fine? if not, and you're using 8.1, check the display options of the saved views . . . there is a setting to globally alter the fill display.

otherwise, check your pen settings? are you using a unique pen for these items whose colour has been over-ridden and set to white or something similar in plotmaker?

last thought: are the elements that aren't printing solely components of library parts?

~/archiben

Re: AC8.1 -> PM9 = No Anno Fills

Anonymous — Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:54:00 GMT

~/archiben wrote:
i take it that fills generally are printing fine? if not, and you're using 8.1, check the display options of the saved views . . . there is a setting to globally alter the fill display.

All fills print just fine.

~/archiben wrote:
otherwise, check your pen settings? are you using a unique pen for these items whose colour has been over-ridden and set to white or something similar in plotmaker?

No special pens. The layouts look great on screen, put they print wrong.

~/archiben wrote:
last thought: are the elements that aren't printing solely components of library parts?

It's only label arrows, section markers, elevation dimensions, etc.. All other objects (ie chairs, toilets,...) print correctly.