<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Window markers misbehaving in Documentation</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Window-markers-misbehaving/m-p/105073#M16860</link>
    <description>I would guess that's a bug. You should try reporting it to your local reseller so they can pass it on to Graphisoft.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:44:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-02-28T18:44:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Window markers misbehaving</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Window-markers-misbehaving/m-p/105071#M16858</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Greetings,&lt;BR /&gt;
I have been trying without success to get a consistent window marker appearance in elevation.  Ideally, each hexagon (see attached jpeg of the model) would have an opaque fill, with a number centered in it, and reading horizontally.  That looks OK in model.&lt;BR /&gt;
When I go to the layout, however, the numbers have rotated against my intention, and my work-around opaque fill rectangle has migrated on top of well, everything (see the next jpeg).&lt;BR /&gt;
This strikes me as weird, and it certainly is inconvenient.&lt;BR /&gt;
Does anyone have a solution for this?  Or perhaps I should go about labelling the windows in elevation in a different way?&lt;BR /&gt;
Currently, I have checked the "Label Window" checkbox in the Selecion Settings diaglog box, and then selecting the "Label Window-Marker SE9" label with some modifications.&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks in advance,&lt;BR /&gt;
John&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/74724i3CCCE506D3F5768E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="model.jpg" title="model.jpg" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 01:14:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Window-markers-misbehaving/m-p/105071#M16858</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-23T01:14:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Window markers misbehaving</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Window-markers-misbehaving/m-p/105072#M16859</link>
      <description>And now, the layout view. Thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Window-markers-misbehaving/m-p/105072#M16859</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-28T18:34:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Window markers misbehaving</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Window-markers-misbehaving/m-p/105073#M16860</link>
      <description>I would guess that's a bug. You should try reporting it to your local reseller so they can pass it on to Graphisoft.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:44:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Window-markers-misbehaving/m-p/105073#M16860</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomWaltz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-28T18:44:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Window markers misbehaving</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Window-markers-misbehaving/m-p/105074#M16861</link>
      <description>Hmm, yes, buggy.&lt;BR /&gt;
But unique to me?  That would be a first!  &lt;BR /&gt;
Maybe I would qualify for a gold foil star sticker.&lt;BR /&gt;
Is there a better way to get solid, consistent elevation markers for the windows?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:10:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Window-markers-misbehaving/m-p/105074#M16861</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-28T19:10:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Window markers misbehaving</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Window-markers-misbehaving/m-p/105075#M16862</link>
      <description>Is "Label Marker SE9" from an AC9 Library, and you're working in 10 (as your signature would suggest)? Could this be where the conflict lies?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:23:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Window-markers-misbehaving/m-p/105075#M16862</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-28T19:23:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Window markers misbehaving</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Window-markers-misbehaving/m-p/105076#M16863</link>
      <description>Yes, exactly.  The marker is a holdover from our earlier refinement of the label.&lt;BR /&gt;
That would be a good source of an incompatibility, but the exact same thing happens when I use the Label Window-Marker 10.  Sme thing with the rotated text, same thing with the position-skipping of my digital white-out.  Further, the rotation of the text is entirely random: at one refresh, it will look right, at the next, it will be rotated.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Window-markers-misbehaving/m-p/105076#M16863</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-28T19:31:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

