<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Poor Quality AC 17 published PDF in Documentation</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Poor-Quality-AC-17-published-PDF/m-p/161114#M24411</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Anyone experienced bad published pdfs? Image below shows the same layout published in ac17 @600dpi and printed to pdf using a free coverter (primo pdf) also at 600dpi.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The Top half shows a scanned image overlaid on a archicad view set/map. and the scanned image is a drawing on an Archicad storey (from jpg) then a view map/set on layout.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Bottom half is part of the layouts title block which should be the same but the text is bolder (and poorer quality) in the AC published file than the print :? &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
As a short term the print can work for the odd drawing but not ideal for issuing large numbers of drawing. And as by boss is "firmly" stating the £2500+ software is creating poorer images than the free one!  :oops:&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="publisher.jpg" style="width: 824px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6508i7F1826D7F9CBE67C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="publisher.jpg" alt="publisher.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 13:57:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-19T13:57:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Poor Quality AC 17 published PDF</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Poor-Quality-AC-17-published-PDF/m-p/161114#M24411</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Anyone experienced bad published pdfs? Image below shows the same layout published in ac17 @600dpi and printed to pdf using a free coverter (primo pdf) also at 600dpi.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The Top half shows a scanned image overlaid on a archicad view set/map. and the scanned image is a drawing on an Archicad storey (from jpg) then a view map/set on layout.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Bottom half is part of the layouts title block which should be the same but the text is bolder (and poorer quality) in the AC published file than the print :? &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
As a short term the print can work for the odd drawing but not ideal for issuing large numbers of drawing. And as by boss is "firmly" stating the £2500+ software is creating poorer images than the free one!  :oops:&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="publisher.jpg" style="width: 824px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6508i7F1826D7F9CBE67C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="publisher.jpg" alt="publisher.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 13:57:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Poor-Quality-AC-17-published-PDF/m-p/161114#M24411</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-19T13:57:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor Quality AC 17 published PDF</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Poor-Quality-AC-17-published-PDF/m-p/161115#M24412</link>
      <description>Can't speak to the problem, but I've always used Nitro PDF (Owner of Primo) to make my PDFs. I found in the past that using the 'save as pdf' option gave me errors, including in AC16. I have a number of fonts that it won't save the inches symbol! Problem solved in Nitro PDF.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:26:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Poor-Quality-AC-17-published-PDF/m-p/161115#M24412</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jere</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-21T18:26:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor Quality AC 17 published PDF</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Poor-Quality-AC-17-published-PDF/m-p/161116#M24413</link>
      <description>The pixilation on the edges of the line-work is due to the jpg compression algorithms. &lt;BR /&gt;
This is not an Archicad problem nor pdf resolution problem.  It is because you scanned into jpg format.&lt;BR /&gt;
[ Look carefully at your drawing, it is only the scan that is poor, the rest is clear as a bell in both images. ]&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Choose another file type (pdf or tiff) for the scan destination type.  &lt;BR /&gt;
If you get an option to use compression - choose NO compression.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
BTW, do not place your scans directly onto stories nor layout sheets.  &lt;BR /&gt;
Place scanned drawings on worksheets, then place the worksheet onto the layout.  &lt;BR /&gt;
This will assist in managing the documents and will make it clearer for others users to follow your workflow.&lt;BR /&gt;
To see the scan on a view map plan view, use virtual trace.  &lt;BR /&gt;
I presume you will eventually be creating AC elements to replace the scanned design drawing and then ultimately turn off the trace.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 16:52:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Poor-Quality-AC-17-published-PDF/m-p/161116#M24413</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-04T16:52:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor Quality AC 17 published PDF</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Poor-Quality-AC-17-published-PDF/m-p/161117#M24414</link>
      <description>HI there&lt;BR /&gt;
I have  experienced bad published pdfs last weeks.I usually &lt;A href="http://www.rasteredge.com/how-to/csharp-imaging/pdf-print/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.rasteredge.com/how-to/csharp-imaging/pdf-print/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.rasteredge.com/how-to/csharp-imaging/pdf-print/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/S&gt;&lt;FONT color="black"&gt;print the pdf&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; files using a pdf processing program before.And it works fine.But after i update my setup to windows 8.It has bad published  pdfs.I don't know why.I changed another &lt;A href="http://www.rasteredge.com/how-to/csharp-imaging/pdf-processing/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;S&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.rasteredge.com/how-to/csharp-imaging/pdf-processing/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.rasteredge.com/how-to/csharp-imaging/pdf-processing/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/S&gt;&lt;FONT color="black"&gt;pdf processing&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;E&gt;&lt;/E&gt; program.It can not work .What should i do?&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for any suggestion.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:37:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Poor-Quality-AC-17-published-PDF/m-p/161117#M24414</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-20T02:37:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

