<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Naming of Renovation statuses in Documentation</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Naming-of-Renovation-statuses/m-p/243861#M37288</link>
    <description>Thanks TJ&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That does help. Sometimes just being able to justify it in my mind is enough, can then use that same justification when explaining to others.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 23:48:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Josh Verran</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-11T23:48:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Naming of Renovation statuses</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Naming-of-Renovation-statuses/m-p/243859#M37286</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;This is a long shot but is there any way to change the renovation status text "To be demolished" to something shorter like "Demolished"?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Finding with schedules and auto-text labels it looks lengthy and a bit out of place.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
For example "existing" doesn't say "remain as existing" and "new" doesn't show as "will be new".&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 13:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Naming-of-Renovation-statuses/m-p/243859#M37286</guid>
      <dc:creator>Josh Verran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-19T13:45:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Naming of Renovation statuses</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Naming-of-Renovation-statuses/m-p/243860#M37287</link>
      <description>Can't help with what you're trying to achieve, but fwiw, if it's "demolished" it wouldn't exist anymore. "To be Demolished" is correct if it's still showing up in the drawings/model. It's not the same as "remain as existing" or "to be new"  - which wouldn't be visible either - if it's not new yet, it doesn't exist &lt;E&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/E&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Hope that's not too pedantic - I do think that sometime's Archicad's terminology is not quite right, but on this occasion I think it's correct.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 23:07:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Naming-of-Renovation-statuses/m-p/243860#M37287</guid>
      <dc:creator>tjmillar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-11T23:07:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Naming of Renovation statuses</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Naming-of-Renovation-statuses/m-p/243861#M37288</link>
      <description>Thanks TJ&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That does help. Sometimes just being able to justify it in my mind is enough, can then use that same justification when explaining to others.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 23:48:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Naming-of-Renovation-statuses/m-p/243861#M37288</guid>
      <dc:creator>Josh Verran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-11T23:48:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

