<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Associateive dimensions for Zones? in Documentation</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Associateive-dimensions-for-Zones/m-p/258132#M39775</link>
    <description>Gerald, &lt;BR /&gt;
Why would you need to dimension a zone and not it's bounding structure?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Scott</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 04:21:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-02-01T04:21:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Associateive dimensions for Zones?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Associateive-dimensions-for-Zones/m-p/258131#M39774</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;One of those 'disappointingly confounding facts of (ArchiCAD) life' - it has never been possible to get associative dimensions for zones.&lt;BR /&gt;
Version 20 has still not delivered this functionality, and I'm still left wondering (with several thousand other users I'm sure) "but why?"&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Can anyone in the developer inner circle please explain?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2023 21:55:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Associateive-dimensions-for-Zones/m-p/258131#M39774</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gerald D Lock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-22T21:55:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Associateive dimensions for Zones?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Associateive-dimensions-for-Zones/m-p/258132#M39775</link>
      <description>Gerald, &lt;BR /&gt;
Why would you need to dimension a zone and not it's bounding structure?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Scott</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 04:21:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Associateive-dimensions-for-Zones/m-p/258132#M39775</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-01T04:21:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Associateive dimensions for Zones?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Associateive-dimensions-for-Zones/m-p/258133#M39776</link>
      <description>If I was doing conceptual work or space planning, I wouldn't want to start drawing walls to have something to dimension.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 18:50:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Associateive-dimensions-for-Zones/m-p/258133#M39776</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aaron Bourgoin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-01T18:50:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Associateive dimensions for Zones?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Associateive-dimensions-for-Zones/m-p/258134#M39777</link>
      <description>Is it because of the same problem you get with the Cadimage door and window schedules - when the schedule is first created you get a set of dimensions. You can edit the dimensions or add more, but when you update the schedule the old objects are deleted and replaced with new objects, and therefore new dimensions. Any modifications to the dimensions are lost. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Does the same apply when updating zones? The old zone elements would be deleted and replaced with new ones?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 22:26:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Associateive-dimensions-for-Zones/m-p/258134#M39777</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-01T22:26:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

