<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Finish Schedule - Older Method in Documentation</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Finish-Schedule-Older-Method/m-p/324568#M49081</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;That is an excellent thought and idea. If I am still forced to go in that direction, I will use this method. I am still trying to get my boss to adjust to the easier/quicker solution. However, the generation gap from his career to mine continues to be a struggle, and understandably so... It happens to each generation, I feel, LOL&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 19:10:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Red</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-08T19:10:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Finish Schedule - Older Method</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Finish-Schedule-Older-Method/m-p/324398#M49064</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;First off, I'm not too fond of a finish schedule like this, but I can not get him to adapt, in my opinion, the more modern way of showing it. I feel this style of finish schedule could cause a person to misread a finish, or even me to mess up drawing it. Can this style be achieved with the Archicad schedule? Possibly with it showing an "X" or checkmark in the column? I can not think of a method with Archicad scheduling doing this, but I thought I would ask before spending the time to draw it manually.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="FS001.JPG" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/17662i7A63A34940169DDA/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="FS001.JPG" alt="FS001.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 18:11:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Finish-Schedule-Older-Method/m-p/324398#M49064</guid>
      <dc:creator>Red</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-07T18:11:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Finish Schedule - Older Method</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Finish-Schedule-Older-Method/m-p/324437#M49072</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Red, if I understand it right I have a solution for you for those dots. Create properties named: Carpet, V.C.T, Concrete sealed... and so on with data type = Option set. Create two (or more) options with "dot" sign and !spacebar" or other chracter from Chracter map. Aply those properties to your rooms.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="LukasZeleny_1-1638915510461.png" style="width: 360px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/17675i00824B829E417338/image-dimensions/360x263?v=v2" width="360" height="263" role="button" title="LukasZeleny_1-1638915510461.png" alt="LukasZeleny_1-1638915510461.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then you can create schedules with dots (in my case with walls).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="LukasZeleny_0-1638915338209.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/17674i683A052DDBD323D5/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="LukasZeleny_0-1638915338209.png" alt="LukasZeleny_0-1638915338209.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But this solution has its dark side, you have to create new property for each finish.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And also creating shedule as in your picture&amp;nbsp;is probably impossible because of the first line dividing the elements by type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I woul rather suggest to export Excel schedules from Archicad with all needed parameters and try to&amp;nbsp;a clean them up in Excely through formulas and macros. But only if this is repetitive task because it will take lot of effort to doit.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 22:29:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Finish-Schedule-Older-Method/m-p/324437#M49072</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lukas Zeleny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-07T22:29:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Finish Schedule - Older Method</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Finish-Schedule-Older-Method/m-p/324438#M49073</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I dont have any answers but i am so sorry that you have to do this... so illogical to me too...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;good luck&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 23:13:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Finish-Schedule-Older-Method/m-p/324438#M49073</guid>
      <dc:creator>SenecaDesignLLC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-07T23:13:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Finish Schedule - Older Method</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Finish-Schedule-Older-Method/m-p/324568#M49081</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is an excellent thought and idea. If I am still forced to go in that direction, I will use this method. I am still trying to get my boss to adjust to the easier/quicker solution. However, the generation gap from his career to mine continues to be a struggle, and understandably so... It happens to each generation, I feel, LOL&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 19:10:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Finish-Schedule-Older-Method/m-p/324568#M49081</guid>
      <dc:creator>Red</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-08T19:10:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

