<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic BIMx AC 25 in Documentation</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/BIMx-AC-25/m-p/354238#M52964</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I seem to remember a lot of discussion on BIMx for 25 (can't find it which is no surprise on this forum) and how bad it is. Was their any mention from GS that it was going to be fixed in the 25 version?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am having to save back to 24 and use its BIMx it get a perfect BIMx, which I was use to coming from 20.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2022 11:48:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Brett Brown</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-08-27T11:48:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BIMx AC 25</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/BIMx-AC-25/m-p/354238#M52964</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I seem to remember a lot of discussion on BIMx for 25 (can't find it which is no surprise on this forum) and how bad it is. Was their any mention from GS that it was going to be fixed in the 25 version?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am having to save back to 24 and use its BIMx it get a perfect BIMx, which I was use to coming from 20.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2022 11:48:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/BIMx-AC-25/m-p/354238#M52964</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brett Brown</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-27T11:48:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

