<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Radius dimensions of composite in Documentation</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Radius-dimensions-of-composite/m-p/36026#M5882</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I just noticed that in dimensioning, the radius dimension will not dimension to the core elements of the wall and can only dimension to the finished face of the wall. Is there any way to overide this and show the radius of a composite wall to the core elements?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2023 22:03:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-22T22:03:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Radius dimensions of composite</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Radius-dimensions-of-composite/m-p/36026#M5882</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I just noticed that in dimensioning, the radius dimension will not dimension to the core elements of the wall and can only dimension to the finished face of the wall. Is there any way to overide this and show the radius of a composite wall to the core elements?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2023 22:03:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Radius-dimensions-of-composite/m-p/36026#M5882</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-22T22:03:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Radius dimensions of composite</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Radius-dimensions-of-composite/m-p/36027#M5883</link>
      <description>As you have noticed, the "core only" function is just for linear dimensions.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
One work around for radial dimensions is to offset the reference line to the core surface. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If you can't change the reference line due to wall clean up issues (or if it's just too much trouble) there is the ugly solution of hiding an arc under the wall and dimensioning to that.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 21:14:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Radius-dimensions-of-composite/m-p/36027#M5883</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-04-23T21:14:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

