<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Placing walls by cores in Documentation</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Placing-walls-by-cores/m-p/95239#M60094</link>
    <description>Would the offset reference line help? Just offset the ref line by the non-core thickness of one side. In the settings dialog at the upper right.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Possible trouble: Detection of the framing intersections rather than the surface intersections is unreliable at some wall junctions, T's for example. For this reason, I don't draw stud walls this way, though I do dimension the cores. I would rather use the reliable outside surfaces and mentally subtract the 1/2" on each side. YMMV.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:29:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>James Murray</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-06-01T18:29:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Placing walls by cores</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Placing-walls-by-cores/m-p/95238#M60093</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;Greetings,&lt;BR /&gt;
Why is it that you cannot place a wall based on the core rather than the face? I see the dimension to core option, but when placing walls I usually go to face of framing rather than finish, but I still want the finish to show. Any suggestions?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 13:26:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Placing-walls-by-cores/m-p/95238#M60093</guid>
      <dc:creator>dwyckoff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-30T13:26:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Placing walls by cores</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Placing-walls-by-cores/m-p/95239#M60094</link>
      <description>Would the offset reference line help? Just offset the ref line by the non-core thickness of one side. In the settings dialog at the upper right.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Possible trouble: Detection of the framing intersections rather than the surface intersections is unreliable at some wall junctions, T's for example. For this reason, I don't draw stud walls this way, though I do dimension the cores. I would rather use the reliable outside surfaces and mentally subtract the 1/2" on each side. YMMV.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:29:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Placing-walls-by-cores/m-p/95239#M60094</guid>
      <dc:creator>James Murray</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-01T18:29:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Placing walls by cores</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Placing-walls-by-cores/m-p/95240#M60095</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;James wrote:&lt;BR /&gt; Just offset the ref line by the non-core thickness of one side.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

You would need to know the required offset rather than the offset being defined by the particular composite being used.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 20:09:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Placing-walls-by-cores/m-p/95240#M60095</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-01T20:09:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

