<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Masking fills for dimension text in Documentation</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Masking-fills-for-dimension-text/m-p/37821#M6153</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I have not seen masking fills for dimension text in version 9.  Am I missing something or did graphisoft not include this "text" feature for dimension text?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 14:06:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-19T14:06:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Masking fills for dimension text</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Masking-fills-for-dimension-text/m-p/37821#M6153</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="actalk-migrated-content"&gt;&lt;T&gt;I have not seen masking fills for dimension text in version 9.  Am I missing something or did graphisoft not include this "text" feature for dimension text?&lt;/T&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 14:06:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Masking-fills-for-dimension-text/m-p/37821#M6153</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-19T14:06:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Masking fills for dimension text</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Masking-fills-for-dimension-text/m-p/37822#M6154</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Mike wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I have not seen masking fills for dimension text in version 9.  Am I missing something or did graphisoft not include this "text" feature for dimension text?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

No doubt omitted to continue the design philosophy of "consistently inconsistent".</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:10:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Masking-fills-for-dimension-text/m-p/37822#M6154</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl Ottenstein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-10-12T19:10:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Masking fills for dimension text</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Masking-fills-for-dimension-text/m-p/37823#M6155</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Karl wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;No doubt omitted to continue the design philosophy of "consistently inconsistent".&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Don't be so harsh, Karl.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have heard a rumour that Graphisoft deliberately disabled some obvious 'features' so that when 9.1 is released they can say more than 'bug fixes'.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;IMG src="https://community.graphisoft.com/legacyfs/online/emojis/icon_smile.gif" style="display : inline;" /&gt; Stuart</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:15:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Masking-fills-for-dimension-text/m-p/37823#M6155</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-10-13T11:15:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

