<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Visually Differentiating Existing &amp;amp; Proposed in Section – Not Working? in Documentation</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648080#M66972</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 05:43:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CHRIS5879</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-30T05:43:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Visually Differentiating Existing &amp; Proposed in Section – Not Working?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648064#M66966</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’m trying to visually differentiate &lt;STRONG&gt;existing and proposed elements in section&lt;/STRONG&gt; within Archicad. I’ve done this before with an automated setting, but I can’t seem to find where thr setting is now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have attached a &lt;STRONG&gt;screenshot&lt;/STRONG&gt; showing the problematic section (at the top) above the two sections that are working correctly. The differeing backdrop makes no difference if it;s white or not, nor do chnages in pen sets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you can see, the last two sections display &lt;STRONG&gt;gray and white areas&lt;/STRONG&gt; to differentiate &lt;STRONG&gt;existing and proposed elements&lt;/STRONG&gt;, but the third section isn’t reflecting these changes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’ve already checked the &lt;STRONG&gt;Renovation Filter, Graphic Overrides, and Model View Options&lt;/STRONG&gt;, but all sections seem to be using the same settings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If someone knows the automated setting in within 'view map' it would be greatly appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" color="grey"&gt;Operating system used: &lt;EM&gt;Windows 10&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="archicad graphisoft community question 30 jan 25.jpg" style="width: 841px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/82515i1A3F0CBB5FCE5A61/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="archicad graphisoft community question 30 jan 25.jpg" alt="archicad graphisoft community question 30 jan 25.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:29:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648064#M66966</guid>
      <dc:creator>CHRIS5879</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-11T02:29:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Visually Differentiating Existing &amp; Proposed in Section – Not Working?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648069#M66967</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Try placing that top section on a white layout page to see if that makes a difference&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You may not be seeing the grey shading as it is the same as the background off the page.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Barry..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 05:09:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648069#M66967</guid>
      <dc:creator>Barry Kelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-30T05:09:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Visually Differentiating Existing &amp; Proposed in Section – Not Working?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648072#M66968</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, but isn't the case. I have copied all three sections (with the problem child one atthe top) against a white background and as you can see it has not fixed the problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/82518i72E881EE340D2BEB/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" border="0" alt="archicad graphisoft community question 30 jan 25.jpg" title="archicad graphisoft community question 30 jan 25.jpg" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 05:14:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648072#M66968</guid>
      <dc:creator>CHRIS5879</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-30T05:14:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Visually Differentiating Existing &amp; Proposed in Section – Not Working?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648077#M66969</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you select the drawing, right click and 'open source view', does it appear as it should?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Barry.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 05:34:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648077#M66969</guid>
      <dc:creator>Barry Kelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-30T05:34:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Visually Differentiating Existing &amp; Proposed in Section – Not Working?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648078#M66970</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, it is the same in both project and view maps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 05:36:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648078#M66970</guid>
      <dc:creator>CHRIS5879</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-30T05:36:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Visually Differentiating Existing &amp; Proposed in Section – Not Working?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648079#M66971</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So the view is correct when you open it, and if you drag that view from the view map onto the layout page, it does not show correctly?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Barry.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 05:38:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648079#M66971</guid>
      <dc:creator>Barry Kelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-30T05:38:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Visually Differentiating Existing &amp; Proposed in Section – Not Working?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648080#M66972</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 05:43:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648080#M66972</guid>
      <dc:creator>CHRIS5879</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-30T05:43:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Visually Differentiating Existing &amp; Proposed in Section – Not Working?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648081#M66973</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Tough one to solve without having the file itself.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you are sure the views look correct when you open them, they all have the same settings and when you drag them to a layout page they behave differently, I am at a loss for ideas as to why.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Barry.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 05:57:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648081#M66973</guid>
      <dc:creator>Barry Kelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-30T05:57:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Visually Differentiating Existing &amp; Proposed in Section – Not Working?</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648109#M66974</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is the problematic&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;Drawing&lt;/EM&gt; on your layout set to to "Black &amp;amp; White"?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Lingwisyer_0-1738226158203.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/82526iCF85A44BE0E69CA2/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Lingwisyer_0-1738226158203.png" alt="Lingwisyer_0-1738226158203.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If it is, then a grey less than 50% would become white.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ling.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 08:37:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Visually-Differentiating-Existing-amp-Proposed-in-Section-Not/m-p/648109#M66974</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-30T08:37:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

