<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: REVISION ID-New Drawings in Documentation</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/REVISION-ID-New-Drawings/m-p/670797#M68702</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Might that be because you are&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;Overriding&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;the&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;Revision ID&lt;/EM&gt; and it is just stepping that? What is the issue with just setting the revision style to start with 00 on the layouts themselves and adding&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;Changes&lt;/EM&gt; when they occur?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ling.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 01:34:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-24T01:34:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>REVISION ID-New Drawings</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/REVISION-ID-New-Drawings/m-p/670723#M68700</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are currently trying to use the Revision History in our Title Block but have encountered a couple of issues related to the automated Revision ID.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the first submission set, setting the Revision ID to "00" is straightforward. Please correct me if I'm mistaken, but I believe this is done by selecting &lt;STRONG&gt;"Override Revision ID for All Included Layouts"&lt;/STRONG&gt; under &lt;EM&gt;Transmittal Set Details&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The challenge arises with the second submission set. There are two main issues:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;New Drawings Receiving Incorrect Rev ID:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We’re reissuing the entire drawing pack with six new/additional drawings. However, when using automated revision IDs, all drawings added in the &lt;EM&gt;Book Settings&lt;/EM&gt; are assigned "01" as their Revision ID. Technically, the new drawings should start with "00" since they are being issued for the first time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Reissued Drawings Incorrectly Incrementing:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The existing drawings being reissued should retain the "00" Revision ID, but once they’re added to the &lt;EM&gt;Book Settings&lt;/EM&gt;, their Revision IDs automatically increment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’ve tried several adjustments but haven’t been able to resolve this issue. Any guidance or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" color="grey"&gt;Operating system used: &lt;EM&gt;Mac Intel-based 15.5 Seqouia&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 12:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/REVISION-ID-New-Drawings/m-p/670723#M68700</guid>
      <dc:creator>JCCARLOS0791</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-23T12:06:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: REVISION ID-New Drawings</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/REVISION-ID-New-Drawings/m-p/670795#M68701</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/150068"&gt;@JCCARLOS0791&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;New Drawings Receiving Incorrect Rev ID:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We’re reissuing the entire drawing pack with six new/additional drawings. However, when using automated revision IDs, all drawings added in the &lt;EM&gt;Book Settings&lt;/EM&gt; are assigned "01" as their Revision ID. Technically, the new drawings should start with "00" since they are being issued for the first time.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I guess it depends on how you look at it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would say those new drawings are a revision of the original drawing set, so should be treated as a revision.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Barry.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:45:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/REVISION-ID-New-Drawings/m-p/670795#M68701</guid>
      <dc:creator>Barry Kelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-24T00:45:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: REVISION ID-New Drawings</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/REVISION-ID-New-Drawings/m-p/670797#M68702</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Might that be because you are&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;Overriding&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;the&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;Revision ID&lt;/EM&gt; and it is just stepping that? What is the issue with just setting the revision style to start with 00 on the layouts themselves and adding&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;Changes&lt;/EM&gt; when they occur?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ling.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 01:34:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/REVISION-ID-New-Drawings/m-p/670797#M68702</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-24T01:34:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

