<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: workflow with stone elements - documentation in Documentation</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/workflow-with-stone-elements-documentation/m-p/680397#M69101</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Beside the suggestion by Barry Kelly I can say that generally is good to model the stone cladding separately for a better control of the height of the cladding, of the distance from the supporting wall, etc ... In this way you can consequently control better the quantity take off.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 09:25:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>alemanda</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-10-17T09:25:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>workflow with stone elements - documentation</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/workflow-with-stone-elements-documentation/m-p/677384#M69014</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i have a general question about how to handle stone elements in order to have a stylish architectural floor plans sections and elevations&lt;BR /&gt;so what is the best practice and workflow if u have stone surfaces in a project..u make ur custom fills and apply them in the structure of the wall in order to be updated in all plans or to add them as an independent fill&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;any thoughts and practices to have similar architectural plans as in autocad for example where u can play with different hatches or opacity to give depth etc or to have diffent fills forin cutting elements and projected surfaces&lt;BR /&gt;for e.g. this facade or similar architecture&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ioanutopia_0-1758490406482.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/92194iE3B686C0605C460E/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="ioanutopia_0-1758490406482.png" alt="ioanutopia_0-1758490406482.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2025 21:40:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/workflow-with-stone-elements-documentation/m-p/677384#M69014</guid>
      <dc:creator>ioanutopia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-21T21:40:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: workflow with stone elements - documentation</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/workflow-with-stone-elements-documentation/m-p/677393#M69015</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have a look at the stonework surfaces that are in the standard template.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They have a surface texture image that you can see in 3D and renders.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BarryKelly_0-1758502177523.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/92198iA90FD5E4003A2890/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="BarryKelly_0-1758502177523.png" alt="BarryKelly_0-1758502177523.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As well as a hatch pattern (fill) that you can see in elevation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BarryKelly_1-1758502215118.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/92199iD714D5D0400B0FBB/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="BarryKelly_1-1758502215118.png" alt="BarryKelly_1-1758502215118.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So no need for separate fills, unless you really want to.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You might be able to load more surfaces from the surface catalogue or additional surface catalogue if you have&amp;nbsp; access to that.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Or you can create your own.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Barry.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 01:21:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/workflow-with-stone-elements-documentation/m-p/677393#M69015</guid>
      <dc:creator>Barry Kelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-22T01:21:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: workflow with stone elements - documentation</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/workflow-with-stone-elements-documentation/m-p/680397#M69101</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Beside the suggestion by Barry Kelly I can say that generally is good to model the stone cladding separately for a better control of the height of the cladding, of the distance from the supporting wall, etc ... In this way you can consequently control better the quantity take off.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 09:25:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/workflow-with-stone-elements-documentation/m-p/680397#M69101</guid>
      <dc:creator>alemanda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-17T09:25:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

