<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Best workflow for multiple wall finish combinations without Composite Bloat in Documentation</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Best-workflow-for-multiple-wall-finish-combinations-without/m-p/704746#M70177</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, I am modeling the finish build-ups as composite layers so they can be properly listed in the schedules. And yes, you are correct, I am labeling the walls based on the Building Material ID.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 11:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Cazer_36</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-06-09T11:31:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best workflow for multiple wall finish combinations without Composite Bloat</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Best-workflow-for-multiple-wall-finish-combinations-without/m-p/703043#M70087</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am looking for the best professional workflow to manage various interior and exterior wall finishes in Archicad without ending up with an uncontrollable number of Composite Structures (Composite Bloat).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have prepared a small demo plan to illustrate the issue. As you can see in the attached image, even in a very small layout, I am forced to create 5 different wall combinations (&lt;STRONG&gt;TYPE-1&lt;/STRONG&gt; to &lt;STRONG&gt;TYPE-5&lt;/STRONG&gt;) because the finish layers (&lt;STRONG&gt;C-1&lt;/STRONG&gt; to &lt;STRONG&gt;C-4&lt;/STRONG&gt;) change depending on the room types on either side of the core wall.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have already tried two common workarounds:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Using Wall Accessories.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Modeling finishes as separate, thin composite/basic walls (furring walls).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, both methods create serious headaches when it comes to doors and windows. The openings do not automatically coordinate seamlessly across multiple walls, and whenever a door/window position or size changes during revisions, it becomes a manual tracking nightmare.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How do you handle this complexity in large-scale professional projects? Is there a native feature, a specific Wall Closure/Opening Tool workflow, or an industry-standard method that makes managing separate finish layers seamless when dealing with doors and windows?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would highly appreciate your insights and workflows. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="003.jpg" style="width: 799px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/101263iC49B2E644D608C4E/image-dimensions/799x629?v=v2" width="799" height="629" role="button" title="003.jpg" alt="003.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" color="grey"&gt;Operating system used: &lt;EM&gt;Windows &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 10:39:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Best-workflow-for-multiple-wall-finish-combinations-without/m-p/703043#M70087</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cazer_36</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-20T10:39:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best workflow for multiple wall finish combinations without Composite Bloat</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Best-workflow-for-multiple-wall-finish-combinations-without/m-p/703640#M70100</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is a related wish that would resolve issues with your second stated workaround. Currently, the wish is listed as &lt;EM&gt;"On Roadmap"&lt;/EM&gt;, though it never was. The &lt;EM&gt;"Opening Input in Section/Elevation"&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;that came out with AC29 was stated as being related though it is a bit of a tangent, and quite a leap in it's current form from the wish...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Wishlist/Opening-Tool-as-Standard-Wall-Penetration-Tool/idc-p/703639#M4214" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Wishlist/Opening-Tool-as-Standard-Wall-Penetration-Tool/idc-p/703639#M4214&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ling.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 08:48:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Best-workflow-for-multiple-wall-finish-combinations-without/m-p/703640#M70100</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-26T08:48:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best workflow for multiple wall finish combinations without Composite Bloat</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Best-workflow-for-multiple-wall-finish-combinations-without/m-p/704559#M70162</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you, Lingwisyer,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The main problem I am facing is that the same structural wall core often requires different finish build-ups on each side depending on the functions of the adjacent rooms, which eventually leads to an excessive number of Composite Structures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I am really curious about is how offices handle this situation in large-scale projects. Are most users modeling finishes as separate walls or accessories and manually managing opening coordination, or is there a more robust Archicad workflow that I may be overlooking?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would be very interested to hear how this is handled in projects.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 19:37:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Best-workflow-for-multiple-wall-finish-combinations-without/m-p/704559#M70162</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cazer_36</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-07T19:37:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best workflow for multiple wall finish combinations without Composite Bloat</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Best-workflow-for-multiple-wall-finish-combinations-without/m-p/704565#M70163</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Drafting wise, are you modelling the finish build-ups as generic thickness, or as composite layers to be listed? I assume you are labelling the walls based on the inside / outside&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;Building Material ID&lt;/EM&gt;?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 01:46:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Best-workflow-for-multiple-wall-finish-combinations-without/m-p/704565#M70163</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lingwisyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-08T01:46:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best workflow for multiple wall finish combinations without Composite Bloat</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Best-workflow-for-multiple-wall-finish-combinations-without/m-p/704746#M70177</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, I am modeling the finish build-ups as composite layers so they can be properly listed in the schedules. And yes, you are correct, I am labeling the walls based on the Building Material ID.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 11:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Documentation/Best-workflow-for-multiple-wall-finish-combinations-without/m-p/704746#M70177</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cazer_36</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-09T11:31:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

