topic Re: Archicad’s Wholistic Approach ? in General discussions

Archicad’s Wholistic Approach ?

mthd — Thu, 15 Sep 2022 09:19:34 GMT

What does this potentially mean for the future direction of development for Archicad ?

Please watch this video on the Archicad 24 world event, from 3 min 20 seconds, in for a few seconds.

Did you notice why the basic functionality and the new features are not the focus right now ?

The answer is obvious but what does that mean for users like me who have used the program for low rise residential work ?

Be happy that the program is developed enough for us to use and forget about the basic functionality improvements for now ?

After all that is exactly why subsequent versions are now focused mainly on collaboration.

So please don’t complain about not getting much more in the way of basic functionality improvements ?

Are there really any better options available for us maybe Vectorworks or Allplan ?

Anyway just wishing that they would put the focus back on basic functionality.

Re: Archicad’s Wholistic Approach ?

Miha_M — Thu, 15 Sep 2022 11:16:50 GMT

I share your concern about the recent Archicad evolution. I noticed a lot of negative feedback about Archicad 26 in this matter. Graphisoft might have lost the usability focus in the recent past.

I would suggest GS to establish a simple user poll or I might just have one myself and publish the results here. It's one simple question with four answer options.

Re: Archicad’s Wholistic Approach ?

mthd — Fri, 16 Sep 2022 04:07:45 GMT

Thank you Miha_M.

please see this link provided by Bricklyne Clarence, for detailed information on the future direction of Archicad’s development by Graphisoft.

https://aecmag.com/bim/the-future-architecture-of-Graphisoft/?fbclid=IwAR2c6uqiAQsDqNTw_FkOFZjtYZlMJKNfIkvp2OjJG375R2zEP6oBdrku7qI

Re: Archicad’s Wholistic Approach ?

Miha_M — Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:14:24 GMT

The poll doesn't get any more votes, so here are the results. This is most likely not representative for the whole Archicad user base, but still: