<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BIM software history in General discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/General-discussions/BIM-software-history/m-p/363556#M2089</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Djordje,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is funny you have just posted this up. I was just on this page today as I was doing some research for a presentation that I am doing next week. The LinkedIn discussion is an interesting one. Sometimes I find it is becoming as toxic as Twitter. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 09:37:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nathan Hildebrandt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-11-30T09:37:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BIM software history</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/General-discussions/BIM-software-history/m-p/363544#M2088</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You might be interested in this... especially good for us dinosaurs, and maybe for the youngsters... things are much more convoluted than it seems &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://miro.com/app/board/o9J_laML2cs=/" target="_blank"&gt;https://miro.com/app/board/o9J_laML2cs=/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A rather interesting LinkedIn discussion is here:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alessio-sarcina_history-of-bim-activity-7001827223800328192-hg2A/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alessio-sarcina_history-of-bim-activity-7001827223800328192-hg2A/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2023 08:18:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/General-discussions/BIM-software-history/m-p/363544#M2088</guid>
      <dc:creator>Djordje</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-09T08:18:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BIM software history</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/General-discussions/BIM-software-history/m-p/363556#M2089</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Djordje,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is funny you have just posted this up. I was just on this page today as I was doing some research for a presentation that I am doing next week. The LinkedIn discussion is an interesting one. Sometimes I find it is becoming as toxic as Twitter. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 09:37:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/General-discussions/BIM-software-history/m-p/363556#M2089</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nathan Hildebrandt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-30T09:37:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BIM software history</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/General-discussions/BIM-software-history/m-p/363560#M2090</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Oh, LinkedIn is sinking deep in the mire of the internet filth… slower than most, but still.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;however, what Artem does is at least interesting. &amp;nbsp;Not saying it is all correct or well researched, and there are some obvious issues, but the BIM universe needs people like that.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 09:43:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/General-discussions/BIM-software-history/m-p/363560#M2090</guid>
      <dc:creator>Djordje</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-30T09:43:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BIM software history</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/General-discussions/BIM-software-history/m-p/363563#M2091</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;100% it is positive that someone has tried to map it out. It would be great to improve the accuracy around a few things. But at least it provides a point for discussion. Bill East's comment about Technology was slightly disappointing. But I am guessing he felt left out.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 09:50:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/General-discussions/BIM-software-history/m-p/363563#M2091</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nathan Hildebrandt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-30T09:50:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

