<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Screen resolution in MacBook Pro, advice requested in General discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/General-discussions/Screen-resolution-in-MacBook-Pro-advice-requested/m-p/687051#M8058</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;On a 16-in 2021 MBP I am using with an iPad Pro as 2nd display, I noticed I have been using the display set to 1728 x 1117 (Default) instead of 2056 x 1329, which gives some nice larger real estate. I don't know how this happened, how I chose or not to use it this way for so long.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any disadvantage to going 2056 x 1329?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 16:41:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ignacio Azpiazu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-12-16T16:41:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Screen resolution in MacBook Pro, advice requested</title>
      <link>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/General-discussions/Screen-resolution-in-MacBook-Pro-advice-requested/m-p/687051#M8058</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;On a 16-in 2021 MBP I am using with an iPad Pro as 2nd display, I noticed I have been using the display set to 1728 x 1117 (Default) instead of 2056 x 1329, which gives some nice larger real estate. I don't know how this happened, how I chose or not to use it this way for so long.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any disadvantage to going 2056 x 1329?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 16:41:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/General-discussions/Screen-resolution-in-MacBook-Pro-advice-requested/m-p/687051#M8058</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ignacio Azpiazu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-16T16:41:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

