2009-04-03 04:05 PM
2009-04-03 06:14 PM
owen wrote:As far as I know, AutoCAD is quite tied in with the Windows APIs (unaware as to Revit's innards). It would probably be a primitive first version (if it ever comes to fruit) but one can't write them off on this kind of thing - AutoDesk certainly have the resources. Whether they think the market is big enough to make the investment is what will decide their course of action.
That the blogger and/or Autodesk would consider that AutoCAD could compete with ArchiCAD shows they really must not get it AT ALL. A Mac version of Revit on the other hand would be a different story .. but i thought unlikely to happen due to all the Windows frameworks it is based on (i.e would basically require a rewrite). I assume this is not the case with AutoCAD?
2009-04-03 06:57 PM
vistasp wrote:I had an idea he has been around for a while. I suppose i should have distinguished between his position (unstated) and what he thought Autodesk may do:
Ralph Grabowski is an old-timer in the CAD world -- I'm sure he knows the difference between electronic drafting and BIM/Virtual Building.😉
'From the survey, we can get an idea of what the first (second, actually) version of AutoCAD for the Mac might not have:So i guess i find the thought of releasing a 2D 'LT' version of AutoCad for mac when you consider predominantly 3D-based apps as your competitors funny. Or they just don't get it .. but i am sure they do, which makes the thought just plain puzzling.
No paper space.
No command line.
No 3D modeling or editing.
Fewer APIs, or none at all.
Running in emulation mode (Boot Camp, Parallels Desktop, or VMware Fusion)
One option is to have an LT-like product for the Mac, initially. From the survey, we learn that Autodesk considers MicroStation, Ashlar, ArchiCAD, VectorWorks, PowerCADD, and SketchUp its primary competitors. Notably, Siemens' NX is missing from the list.'
2009-04-04 10:43 PM
2009-04-06 06:07 PM
2009-04-06 06:10 PM
2009-04-06 06:40 PM
william235711 wrote:Don't get me wrong, i am completely aware Autodesks objective is a state where they are the only CAD vendor and we all have to pay them a monthly fee for the privilege of using their software (and you can forget about owning it outright).
Autodesk just wants to dominate the market. They could care less about the Mac. Play with the latest Mac beta of Rhino if you want to see how much work it is. I don't think the economics make sense.
As Vaporware though, it makes lots of sense.
2009-04-07 01:55 AM
I actually suspect the impetus for this is the growing number of Windows users (i.e existing Autodesk customers) contemplating switching to OS X rather than existing Mac users wanting to use Autodesk products.Yep, that's what I would say too.
2009-04-07 02:09 AM
Rob wrote:Yep .. and thats why this may well all be just talk. From the sounds of it Microsoft technologies are pretty well embedded in all recent Autodesk products (AutoCAD included). If it means they essentially have to write a whole new app for OS X then i guess it would not make sense (they certainly have the pockets for it though)
I do not believe Adesk is serious about going to OSX especially when they decided to ditch OpenGL for DX in the latest Revit release...
2009-04-21 05:12 AM