I appreciate your answer ejrolon. I got what I needed.
I will use beams only when I can not achieve a result expected with Walls+CProfiles.
------------
Some things are taking me too much time to figure it out.
My expectative is to develop and parametrize an idea of a home, while the idea changes because of the owner's will is getting more accurate, and/or because of better energy/material/construction performance.
Otherwise going directly into the construction and fix issues would be cheaper.
------------
(Please correct me if I am wrong)
Sry, I tried to be shorter in first post.
Further for 2.4)
The reason to ask, is that the solution may be right in front my eyes but I don't know it yet.
Further for 2.3)
Conceptually in real-world a Wall splits places by placing an X material between some 2 sides / ambients.
A beam does not.
A Beam is a solid element capable of holding the external natural forces out of the Walls.
Because of that, the Floorplan should not confuse them, having different symbologies for each.
Then, using Walls+CProfiles, is a decision based in the software constraints, not in a better modeling of the reality.
--------------
In AC, the materials classified as "Core" objects are those that holds the external forces over an individual Complex Profile.
While the Property of an object "Load-Bearing" explicitly says that this object, made of certain profile, describes the structure holding the entire project.
Those, to be able to show the Reinforced concrete inside a CProfile (which in reality would be a beam), I have to make the Wall as a "Load-Bearing" and is not. So the information modelled contradicts reality.
If I tell the Wall to be a "Load-Bearing" object, then I am making all of its Individual Core object parts of the holding structure of the project. But the Walls are really only insulation proposes with light core materials.
My work around to this was:
- Make a set of CProfiles for my region building materials and different uses.
- Make some of those sets to contain the same Material used for Structural Beams.
- Use Walls where ever should be a Wall in reality.
- Use Beams crossing around if there should be no-wall below it.
The persistent problem is:
- The Model Display: Core only shows windows and doors asociated with Walls. They are not Core !!!
- The Model Display: Core on Load-Bearings object only shows cores of Walls too.
The new workaround for this was:
- Make the real Core objects of CProfiles for walls classified as "Other". Not finishings, not cores.
- Leave only Material meant to be Core-Load-Bearing as Core of the Wall.
- Make ALL Walls as "Load-Bearings"
The LAST persistent problem is:
- Windows and Doors show up in Model View Core on Load-Bearings objects only, but those do not have that property to be setup.
I will use beams only when I can not achieve a result expected with Walls+CProfiles.
------------
Some things are taking me too much time to figure it out.
My expectative is to develop and parametrize an idea of a home, while the idea changes because of the owner's will is getting more accurate, and/or because of better energy/material/construction performance.
Otherwise going directly into the construction and fix issues would be cheaper.
------------
(Please correct me if I am wrong)
Sry, I tried to be shorter in first post.
Further for 2.4)
The reason to ask, is that the solution may be right in front my eyes but I don't know it yet.
Further for 2.3)
Conceptually in real-world a Wall splits places by placing an X material between some 2 sides / ambients.
A beam does not.
A Beam is a solid element capable of holding the external natural forces out of the Walls.
Because of that, the Floorplan should not confuse them, having different symbologies for each.
Then, using Walls+CProfiles, is a decision based in the software constraints, not in a better modeling of the reality.
--------------
In AC, the materials classified as "Core" objects are those that holds the external forces over an individual Complex Profile.
While the Property of an object "Load-Bearing" explicitly says that this object, made of certain profile, describes the structure holding the entire project.
Those, to be able to show the Reinforced concrete inside a CProfile (which in reality would be a beam), I have to make the Wall as a "Load-Bearing" and is not. So the information modelled contradicts reality.
If I tell the Wall to be a "Load-Bearing" object, then I am making all of its Individual Core object parts of the holding structure of the project. But the Walls are really only insulation proposes with light core materials.
My work around to this was:
- Make a set of CProfiles for my region building materials and different uses.
- Make some of those sets to contain the same Material used for Structural Beams.
- Use Walls where ever should be a Wall in reality.
- Use Beams crossing around if there should be no-wall below it.
The persistent problem is:
- The Model Display: Core only shows windows and doors asociated with Walls. They are not Core !!!
- The Model Display: Core on Load-Bearings object only shows cores of Walls too.
The new workaround for this was:
- Make the real Core objects of CProfiles for walls classified as "Other". Not finishings, not cores.
- Leave only Material meant to be Core-Load-Bearing as Core of the Wall.
- Make ALL Walls as "Load-Bearings"
The LAST persistent problem is:
- Windows and Doors show up in Model View Core on Load-Bearings objects only, but those do not have that property to be setup.
Yes but the learning curve, seem to be equal to the process of finding workarounds.
They are mostly workflows not workarounds and even those are expected since we are not talking about writing letters in MS Word. 
Still looking?
