- last edited on by
Rubia Torres
And try to show total Run of the Stair. Even with a label. 
I haven't found how to do that yet.
The annotation I need to show for the Stair looks something like this: or at least this kind of information.
(17) RISERS @ 7 5/32" = 10'-1 3/4" - TOTAL RISE
(16) TREADS @ 11"= 14'-8" - TOTAL RUN
And what this annotation needs to represent is the Stair - not the Carriage which most often will have one less riser than the appropriate way to annotate the Stair.
Be careful how you use Start with riser/tread - End with riser/tread because you may be generating annotation for the Carriage rather than for the Stair.
If there is a Number of Risers = Stair Height, Why is there no Number of Goings = Stair Run ?
Goings?!?! Really? Why didn't they just ask me to help them with the words?
I haven't found how to do that yet.
The annotation I need to show for the Stair looks something like this: or at least this kind of information.
(17) RISERS @ 7 5/32" = 10'-1 3/4" - TOTAL RISE
(16) TREADS @ 11"= 14'-8" - TOTAL RUN
And what this annotation needs to represent is the Stair - not the Carriage which most often will have one less riser than the appropriate way to annotate the Stair.
Be careful how you use Start with riser/tread - End with riser/tread because you may be generating annotation for the Carriage rather than for the Stair.
If there is a Number of Risers = Stair Height, Why is there no Number of Goings = Stair Run ?
Goings?!?! Really? Why didn't they just ask me to help them with the words?
?
Answer: Use the End with Tread function - but what if you don't want to end with a tread but you don't want the gap?
Answer: Use the End with Tread function - but what if you don't want to end with a tread but you don't want the gap?
Hello there,
I will just add this here, no reason to open a new thread.
I have a monolithic stair with slanted risers, no finish on the treads.
As you can see the value of the slanting distance is not equal to the real distance in a section view.
later that day: I noticed that even if you select the "no finish"option and previously had a non-zero value on the finish tread, it still takes into account that value somehow.
It looks to me as this approach is part of a broken workflow. Once I have set the "no finish" the tool shoudn't consider those values anymore, don't you think?
Thank you for looking into this.
I will just add this here, no reason to open a new thread.
I have a monolithic stair with slanted risers, no finish on the treads.
As you can see the value of the slanting distance is not equal to the real distance in a section view.
later that day: I noticed that even if you select the "no finish"option and previously had a non-zero value on the finish tread, it still takes into account that value somehow.
It looks to me as this approach is part of a broken workflow. Once I have set the "no finish" the tool shoudn't consider those values anymore, don't you think?
Thank you for looking into this.
Still looking?
