Hi leceta,
You are right, this is indeed a possibility but it would require a complete re-writing of the scripts or as I wrote
So what I am saying is, I have written my scripts in python and it does the job. Reinventing the whole thing now just that other people can use them as well is a bit a showstopper.
Edit: It also seems to be a bit unstable, my canvas just literally went bloody red after the panel looked like it got beaten up badly .... this has never happend before, but it is a kind of funny discovery too
Anyway, seems to be just too much information for the panel - the output works .. but it seems to be still very slow. Iterating Classifications Details for 10 Elements took more than 10 second ... I have about more than 700 ... why is this taking so long here, it is just a simple loop over all my ClassificationitemGuids ...
You are right, this is indeed a possibility but it would require a complete re-writing of the scripts or as I wrote
Sure I could either use the JSON Interface directly but this would take lots of time to set it up and as I think I am not alone who wants such features this is not my task either.Probably this is going way faster than I am thinking right now e.g. with a good input dictionary logic and rebuilding the methods with well thought-out loops does the job sooner or later ...
{
"command": "API.GetElementsByType",
"parameters": {
"elementType": "Wall"
}
}
... but it is still a bit complex and the whole handling is not very good .... probably it would be even easier to access an existing python script which is customized with the help of GH, then saved locally via the filewriter component just to be executed afterwards to make the changes .... yeah I know, does not sound like the shortest way, but that's how it feels ...So what I am saying is, I have written my scripts in python and it does the job. Reinventing the whole thing now just that other people can use them as well is a bit a showstopper.
Edit: It also seems to be a bit unstable, my canvas just literally went bloody red after the panel looked like it got beaten up badly .... this has never happend before, but it is a kind of funny discovery too
Anyway, seems to be just too much information for the panel - the output works .. but it seems to be still very slow. Iterating Classifications Details for 10 Elements took more than 10 second ... I have about more than 700 ... why is this taking so long here, it is just a simple loop over all my ClassificationitemGuids ...
Hey JSN:
I have been following your posts and am curious as to your intended use of Grasshopper? I see that there was some initial complaint about the slowness of the script. I didn't see any significant difference other than the initial requests time delays. Also, to that point, since the initial request of GetCllasifcationItems returns all the info you are asking -- why then call GetDetails? Also don't see a need for the double conversion of JSON commands?
Finally, Since the script will work just as well within Archicad, any IDE, or Grasshopper, allowing for the change in urllib2 from 2.7 to 3.0+, what is the advantage of Grasshopper? What are you ultimately trying to accomplish that can't be directly done in Archicad or the Archhicad/Grasshopper interface? -- Just asking?
To illustrate my point I have attached a Python Grasshopper script that returns the classifications info with minimal delay.Runs equally well within Archicad -- just change urlib2 to urllib - change from 2.7 to 3.0+
I have been following your posts and am curious as to your intended use of Grasshopper? I see that there was some initial complaint about the slowness of the script. I didn't see any significant difference other than the initial requests time delays. Also, to that point, since the initial request of GetCllasifcationItems returns all the info you are asking -- why then call GetDetails? Also don't see a need for the double conversion of JSON commands?
Finally, Since the script will work just as well within Archicad, any IDE, or Grasshopper, allowing for the change in urllib2 from 2.7 to 3.0+, what is the advantage of Grasshopper? What are you ultimately trying to accomplish that can't be directly done in Archicad or the Archhicad/Grasshopper interface? -- Just asking?
To illustrate my point I have attached a Python Grasshopper script that returns the classifications info with minimal delay.Runs equally well within Archicad -- just change urlib2 to urllib - change from 2.7 to 3.0+
#import rhinoscriptsyntax as rs
import json
import urllib2 as rb
#request = rb.Request('http://localhost:19723')
request = 'http://localhost:19723'
response = rb.urlopen(request,json.dumps({"command":"API.GetAllClassificationSystems"}).encode('UTF-8'))
results = json.loads(response.read())
result = results['result']['classificationSystems'][1]['classificationSystemId']['guid']
response.close()
response = rb.urlopen(request,json.dumps({"command":"API.GetAllClassificationsInSystem",
"parameters": {"classificationSystemId": {"guid": result }}}).encode('UTF-8'))
results = json.loads(response.read())
response.close()
seed =results['result']['classificationItems']
output = []
level = 0
def get_ids(seed,kids = 0 ):
global level
level += 1
for item in seed:
output.append( ' '*(level-1) + item['classificationItem']['id'])
if kids >0:
kids -= 1
if 'children' in item['classificationItem'].keys():
depth = len(item['classificationItem']['children'])
get_ids(item['classificationItem']['children'], kids = depth)
else:
if kids == 0:
pass # Debug only
level -= 1
get_ids(seed, kids = 0 )
for x in output:
print(x)
Start a new conversation!
Still looking?
