2019-02-27 05:38 AM
2019-02-27 08:23 PM
2019-02-28 12:11 AM
2019-02-28 12:37 AM
2019-02-28 12:39 AM
Erwin wrote:Out of interest, why do you go with a physical preset? If I understood correctly it tried to replicate an image from a real camera, with options for aperture/shutter speed/DoF etc - I've usually found this slower than the non-physical option.
by starting off with the 'fast' physical render presets and just adjusting a few settings.
2019-02-28 01:39 AM
Kieran wrote:Yes, physical renderer yields better results and some of the settings are like a camera, so if you know your photography, it's easy to set up.
Erwin wrote:Out of interest, why do you go with a physical preset? If I understood correctly it tried to replicate an image from a real camera, with options for aperture/shutter speed/DoF etc - I've usually found this slower than the non-physical option.
by starting off with the 'fast' physical render presets and just adjusting a few settings.
2019-02-28 02:09 AM
2019-03-04 12:45 AM