Best Practice: Beam Tool vs. Beam Object
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Monday
Between and Object (out-of-the-box "Steel Beams 27") and the beam tool, what are the benefits of using one over the other for modeling structural steel beams? I'd like to standardize one over the other in our BIM Manual, so I'm trying to consider all implications: intuitive and correct plan/section display, elevation/length input, ease of use, IFC translations, etc.
I'm currently doing some testing of my own, but I'm curious if anyone has any previous insights? Thanks!
Operating system used: Mac Apple Silicon 14.7.1 Sonoma
macOS Sonoma 14.7.1 - 2021 MacBook Pro 16", M1 Max Chip, 64gb DDR5
Browser: Google Chrome
- Labels:
-
Beams
-
Complex Profiles

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Monday - last edited Tuesday
I'm very interested in hearing how others handle this as well. From my experience, it depends on what you are trying to achieve. If you are modeling complex steel framing, then perhaps using objects would be better, since there are a number of additional parameters in the beam object that the beam tool doesn't have. However, if the steel framing you are trying to model isn't very complex AND/OR you are planning on collaborating with a structural engineer using SAF model exchange, then perhaps the beam tool (and column tool) is the way to go.
Steel tower framing using objects:
Steel tower framing using column tool & beam tool for SAF model exchange.
MacBook Pro M1 Max; 64 GB RAM; 10CPU/32GPU cores (macOS Sequoia)
ArchiCAD 28/27/26/25 Full (back when Full used to mean Full) (latest builds). User since AC12 (2008).