2007-03-13 04:41 AM
2007-08-29 03:33 PM
Link wrote:Do you think this is better than using a line type and drawing over the walls in section or paln? Or now that I have made the fill, using that in my composites and that in section as a drafting fill and rotating the origin?
I still can't believe GS won't let us use symbol lines in our composites. I mean what an easy fix to give us so much flexibility, for a variety of wall types.
Because cut fill origins cannot be manipulated within walls, trying to generate batt insulation in a wall is not best achieved by fills. And Because GS won't give us symbol lines in our composites, we are left with rather an ugly workaround (again).
We are lucky enough to have been supplied with an insulation library part that we can stretch over our walls. It's quite a nice little object, but it is a workaround nonetheless.
Cheers,
Link.
2007-08-29 05:26 PM
2007-08-29 05:50 PM
Jesikuh123 wrote:There's not much in it really. I just think it it would be faster to place the library part rather than fiddle with fills and origins.
Do you think this is better than using a line type and drawing over the walls in section or paln? Or now that I have made the fill, using that in my composites and that in section as a drafting fill and rotating the origin?
And Why? Does the library part have any pros?
2007-08-29 05:58 PM
zaigram wrote:1) Yes!
In order to add it to the wish list I think these things would help:
1) allow symbol lines as separtor lines in wall compositions
2) Being able to create a symboline with an offset would help also. By this I mean a symbol line such as the batt insulation with a baseline to one side rather then down the center of the symbol
3) Need some kind of Custom Wall fill option that recognizes the orientation of the fill in relation to the path of the base line.
2007-09-04 07:02 AM
2007-09-20 11:41 AM
2007-09-20 12:05 PM
2007-09-20 08:07 PM
2007-09-21 08:13 AM