2007-01-31 10:53 AM
2007-02-05 03:33 PM
2007-02-05 04:20 PM
Tomtomas wrote:It depends on how you placed the door. If you locate it by its center or by its edge, that is the point it will grow outward from. You can change its reference later if you want.
Thank you for example. But even simple non-associative door schedule can show such mistakes.
Now, what will happen if you change the door width in the schedule? Will the door width in the model increase to the left, to the right or both left and right?
2007-02-05 05:13 PM
TomWaltz wrote:
It depends on how you placed the door. If you locate it by its center or by its edge, that is the point it will grow outward from. You can change its reference later if you want.
With BIM, as with many other technologies, a little discipline while you are working pays off.
2007-02-05 05:51 PM
Tomtomas wrote:Tomtomas,
...And will mess your model if you forgot constrain somewhere somehow ...
I think that making changes to the 3d model via schedule is fundamentally wrong.
2007-02-05 07:06 PM
Tomtomas wrote:You are correct, a non-associate door schedule can show those mistakes. And Revit (like AC that Dan has pointed out) can show the door in your project by highlighting it in the schedule and then by clicking Show.
Thank you for example. But even simple non-associative door schedule can show such mistakes.
Now, what will happen if you change the door width in the schedule? Will the door width in the model increase to the left, to the right or both left and right?
2007-02-05 08:22 PM
2007-02-05 08:32 PM
Tomtomas wrote:Don't get me wrong. Given the choice, I'd rather make the change in a location I can see what I'm changing. I just think it's important for a "BIM" software to have the option to change something from any the element visible.
I think we are getting to consensus here
My point is that information in schedule is not enough to make predictable changes in 3D model. You still need to control visually how your changes affect the model. If you edit the schedule and don't get the expected result then you still need to edit the object directly. Then why not to do it in the first place?
Associative schedules are great. But it's not some kind a killer tool changing all the work flow