2011-03-09 08:57 PM - last edited on 2023-05-23 06:07 PM by Rubia Torres
2011-03-09 09:49 PM
NStocks wrote:Try creating the rails using profiled objects created with OBJECTiVE. The objects are generally lightweight in 3D, and you can control the faceting of curved sections to minimise the polygon count (use the
I've created a railway track, using custom profiles (beams) but now my ArchiCAD file seems to be very slow. I find that I have to open things gradually in layers in the 3D window just to view them. As you can see from the attachment, the beams are taking up most of the count as I have also inserted sleepers to make the rail track more realistic.
2011-03-09 10:00 PM
Ralph wrote:Funnily enough I use objective in the first place, but I wasn't able to do something with it. Can't remember what it was, maybe bend in on plan or make all the rail track join together. The latter sounds more like my issues, so naturally for this reason I chose the beam and complex profile route as they join together perfectly..NStocks wrote:Try creating the rails using profiled objects created with OBJECTiVE. The objects are generally lightweight in 3D, and you can control the faceting of curved sections to minimise the polygon count (use the
I've created a railway track, using custom profiles (beams) but now my ArchiCAD file seems to be very slow. I find that I have to open things gradually in layers in the 3D window just to view them. As you can see from the attachment, the beams are taking up most of the count as I have also inserted sleepers to make the rail track more realistic.Facetingsetting).
2011-03-09 10:41 PM
2011-03-10 10:30 AM
NStocks wrote:No, you can't 'magic wand' OBJECTiVE parts to polyline (but it's on the wish list ).
Just tried it with objective and it was indeed the fact that I couldn't 'join' the pieces together like I could with beams. Also the curves are harder to align correctly. The magic wand doesn't work with objective does it ? Or is there another way i.e using the polyline as the main frame outline, then 'place' the Objective profile on that?
2011-03-10 01:45 PM
NStocks wrote:Another approach is to simplify the Custom Profile: eliminate curves and faces, consider how detailed/realistic the profile needs to be given the viewing distances. If some pieces are seen close up, then make only those more detailed. Apply this approach to both the rails and sleepers.
I've created a railway track, using custom profiles (beams) but now my ArchiCAD file seems to be very slow.
...
Is this poly count way to large? How can I 'fix' the problem?
2011-03-10 06:40 PM
David wrote:How do I apply that to custom profile beams and standard beams? I've checked the settings but didn't find anything. Also using the poly-count Level of Details did nothing for me...NStocks wrote:Another approach is to simplify the Custom Profile: eliminate curves and faces, consider how detailed/realistic the profile needs to be given the viewing distances. If some pieces are seen close up, then make only those more detailed. Apply this approach to both the rails and sleepers.
I've created a railway track, using custom profiles (beams) but now my ArchiCAD file seems to be very slow.
...
Is this poly count way to large? How can I 'fix' the problem?
David
2011-03-11 06:23 AM
As a 'guide' what is the general amount of polygons in one project (i.e have you experienced as high as what is now 56,000 ?)I just did a check on one of our commercial projects and it came in at nearly half a million polygons. And that's with door knobs turned off, but I know they go much higher.
2011-03-11 07:39 AM
Link wrote:It's not how many polygons you have but what you can do with them that counts.As a 'guide' what is the general amount of polygons in one project (i.e have you experienced as high as what is now 56,000 ?)I just did a check on one of our commercial projects and it came in at nearly half a million polygons. And that's with door knobs turned off, but I know they go much higher.
Cheers,
Link.
2011-03-11 01:54 PM
NStocks wrote:Taking Ralph's illustration # 1 as an example, each curve will generate 9 facets, so that profile would generate about 75 polygons. Chamfers could replace the curves, reducing the polygon count to about 20. You could select one piece of rail and get a polygon count to see how many polygons your custom profiles are generating. Standard beams (rectangles) are as simple already.
How do I apply that to custom profile beams and standard beams?