2005-11-09 03:17 PM
2005-11-17 05:51 AM
Did we shoot our selves in the foot by subscribing early?Steve,
2005-11-17 08:53 AM
ArchiCAD 25 7000 USA - Windows 10 Pro 64x - Dell 7720 64 GB 2400MHz ECC - Xeon E3 1535M v6 4.20GHz - (2) 1TB M.2 PCIe Class 50 SSD's - 17.3" UHD IPS (3840x2160) - Nvidia Quadro P5000 16GB GDDR5 - Maxwell Studio/Render 5.2.1.49- Multilight 2 - Adobe Acrobat Pro - ArchiCAD 6 -25
2005-12-09 02:59 PM
2005-12-11 11:05 PM
2005-12-12 04:49 AM
stefan wrote:Actually one of the reasons I chose AC over Revit at the time was because I didn't see any benefits of supporting Autodesk by subscribing. I can understand some of the benefits for some companies to be able to "budget easily for a new version of program X...". But lets be honest here, the real benefit for this type of program is for the Software maker not for the end user since they get to budget their profits before the product is produced. This scenario benefits the accountants since they know that they already have X amounts of dollars out of which we can spend Y (X - Profit) for the development of the next release.
The subscription scenario is coming anyhow. Everybody is going that route... Let's not kid ourselves: you pay now for an update that comes later, instead of paying after the update is released (which is after all costs are made by Graphisoft).
Macbook Pro M1 Max 64GB ram, OS X 10.XX latest
another Moderator
2005-12-12 10:00 AM
I rather see what GS produces and if it is a worthwhile upgrade then I will upgrade if not I will keep my money and stay with the version that works and sorry to say this but I will also start to look at other options... A $200 savings and some freebies is not enough for me to buy a "Surprise Software Upgrade" box.that's exactly my attitude. I'd like to asses the goods first and then I will make my decision. I suppose, we are all in a business, so we have to be able to take risks, so GS (or any software developer I should say) should...
You have to take all costs into account: if a new version increases your productivity (which I think ArchiCAD 9 did), it pays for itself. I think that Lightworks rendering alone could justify the upgrade from 8 to 9.it's not so simple. LW wasn't the major feature that made us upgrade to v.9 at our office. it was actually new text tool and stability and I think we wouldn't have upgraded our software just because LW. Why? We've got guys trained on Artlantis and simply architects at our office don't have time to fiddle with that. However, I have to say that Dwight's book came quite handy and hopefully we will give LW a go, yet LW implementation in v9 is rather primitive and needs to be revised in some aspects but that's a different story....
2005-12-12 10:08 AM
2005-12-12 10:16 AM
Karl wrote:Unfortunately we were forced to buy a new license after a key was stolen (not specifically but along with other items)I don't believe anybody has ever had to pay the full price for a lost/damaged key...?
Karl
2005-12-12 02:34 PM
Aussie wrote:It is realy nightmare.Karl wrote:I don't believe anybody has ever had to pay the full price for a lost/damaged key...?Unfortunately we were forced to buy a new license after a key was stolen (not specifically but along with other items)
Karl
2005-12-12 04:50 PM
stefan wrote:But, would you have paid for it beforehand without knowing that those were the features that are part of AC09?
LW 'could' justify the upgrade... Well, this depends on your office, obviously. To me, the new docking interface, the LightWorks rendering engine and the overall stability improvements and cleanup were worth the update.
Macbook Pro M1 Max 64GB ram, OS X 10.XX latest
another Moderator