PARAM-O object partially showed in section
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2021-05-03
11:20 AM
- last edited on
ā2023-05-25
09:08 AM
by
Noemi Balogh
I made a foot anchor for wood pillars with PARAM-O. The metallic part is made completely with nodes, instead the concrete foundation is made starting with a profile (cause I don't know how to make it with nodes). The problem is that in section the foundation is not showed. I tried with other profiles and even with those it doesn't work, I don't know what's wrong. There aren't problems in plan, elevation and 3d views.
I attach the PARAM-O file, sorry but I don't know how to export the profile.
p.s. I have already checked layer visibility, overriders, etc.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2021-05-03 11:58 AM
Try not to use profile when you need to make objects like these.
You can model your shape with morph instead. If you want that it would be part of your PARAM-O object - save your morph as GDL object and use this object in PARAM-O (command called "GDL Object" in Extras).
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2021-05-04 10:51 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2021-05-04 10:57 AM
Barry.
Versions 6.5 to 27
i7-10700 @ 2.9Ghz, 32GB ram, GeForce RTX 2060 (6GB), Windows 10
Lenovo Thinkpad - i7-1270P 2.20 GHz, 32GB RAM, Nvidia T550, Windows 11
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2021-05-04 11:03 AM
DGSketcher, I want to use it with different pillar sizes, so I think is better to make it as PARAM-O object. But thanks for the suggestion, that add-on looks interesting.
Barry, I made other foundation as you suggest, but for this one I want to make a single completed object.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2021-05-04 11:10 AM
Barry wrote:In which case it becomes parametric
Or build it with a segmented column.
Barry.

elle86, if you take Barry's column option it would be formed with a square base, the next segment would be tapered, add another square for the top of the concrete, a fourth segment as the bracket base plate and then the side plates would be formed with a fifth segment using a complex profile. Easy when you know how and a lot easier than Param-O!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2021-05-04 11:15 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2021-05-04 11:35 AM
DGSketcher wrote:
In which case it becomes parametric![]()
And with a bit of effort (using modifiers in the complex profiles) you can even add bolts and other bits in the sides.
Just a case of stacking a lot of segments on top of each other.
A couple of examples.
Barry.
Versions 6.5 to 27
i7-10700 @ 2.9Ghz, 32GB ram, GeForce RTX 2060 (6GB), Windows 10
Lenovo Thinkpad - i7-1270P 2.20 GHz, 32GB RAM, Nvidia T550, Windows 11

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2021-05-08 09:40 PM
I have used 4 Wedge Nodes and subtracted them from a Block to create the bottom and middle portion of it, then used another Block Node to create the top portion.
It is parametric, so you can set its base length and width, top length and width, base height, middle height, full height, plus pen and surface.
Enjoy.
AMD Ryzen9 5900X CPU, 64 GB RAM 3600 MHz, Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB, 500 GB NVMe SSD
2x28" (2560x1440), Windows 10 PRO ENG, Ac20-Ac28