Visualization
About built-in and 3rd party, classic and real-time rendering solutions, settings, workflows, etc.

!Restored: Cinema 4D CE 6

Karl Ottenstein
Moderator
Ola wrote:
I purchased Cinema 4D 8.2 and was wondering what the best way to export from Archicad and workflow. How does the rendering time vs result compare to Artlantis. Just purchased Piranesi also, I believe you can create a Epix file directly in C4D now

thanks
Lots of new toys! 😉

I only have C4D XL 7 - so AFAIK, there I have to use 3DS and Vedute to go into Piranesi. Nice if 8.2 allows it directly.

3DS format works well from AC to C4D. See various notes and comments in the archives at:

http://www.escribe.com/software/archicadtalk/

and there are also some good comments at:

http://www.fred-speaks.com/phpBB2/index.php

Some of those guys will hopefully re-post their comments here with some nice screenshots of the parameter settings dialogs (hint, hint).

As for speed, comparing C4D and Artlantis is difficult because C4D can do so much more than Artlantis, particularly as far as lighting goes...if you have the "Advanced Render" module (or the XL package). For comparable quality on a fast computer, I don't know that you'd see the difference. With a dual processor, C4D wins since Artlantis won't use the other processor. As soon as you use a radiosity solution, C4D will start to slow down (the race depends on your parameters and number of processors - or even network rendering, and option there and not with Artlantis) - but the results will astound you compared to Artlantis 'global illumination'.

[For example: if the C4D 8.2 CD contains some of the same sample scenes as XL7... look for a folder called 'Radiosity-LIght'. There's a JPG there ("Light") that is a wonderful demonstration of lighting effects that C4D can do and Artlantis cannot even come close to. Load the sample scene file in C4D and render it as a sample of how long such a thing takes on your computer. Not bad at all on mine. I've attached a cropped section of that image for others to see here ... image copyright Maxon Computer I should imagine.]

Including human time, Artlantis is a no-brainer IMHO - wins hands down for quick renderings.

Even if you cannot create the EPix file in C4D ... you can create the file in AC or Artlantis, then render the (same sized) image in C4D and finally import that image as the new Save RGB channel in Piranesi. Mix and match.

Have fun!

Karl

maxon-light.jpg
One of the forum moderators
AC 28 USA and earlier   •   macOS Sequoia 15.2, MacBook Pro M2 Max 12CPU/30GPU cores, 32GB
124 REPLIES 124
Anonymous
Not applicable
ok.... I found what was the prob... thanx anyway


cy all
Anonymous
Not applicable
Would someone please post another issue within this terrific thread. That last post left it with a non-visual dead end.

With 1964 views this thread is still behind Piranesi at 2135 but still ahead of Archilumos at 1491 (3/25/04)

Michael Rensing where are you!?!?

Thanx

Mark
Anonymous
Not applicable
I have found that while using the eXchange plug in, it asks for a conversion value.

Working in Foot values it works very good, perhaps not exact, to use the value 3.25.

Now a 20 ft cube in C4D matches the 20 cube built in ArchiCAD and the scale factor helps all other measurements, lights, falloff, etc.

DJ one time corrected this value to higher precision, but I forget what he figured out.

Mark
Dwight
Newcomer
CONVERTING FEET TO METRES IS 3.281
Dwight Atkinson
Djordje
Virtuoso
Dwight wrote:
CONVERTING FEET TO METRES IS 3.281
1/.305=3.2786

Set ArchiCAD units to feet, dimension one foot using metric.
Djordje



ArchiCAD since 4.55 ... 1995
HP Omen
Laszlo Nagy
Community Admin
Community Admin
1 foot = 12 inches = 12 x 25.4 millimeters = 0.3048 meters in Hungary.
Maybe the difference of your values comes from different rounding.
Laszlo
Loving Archicad since 1995 - Find Archicad Tips at x.com/laszlonagy
AMD Ryzen9 5900X CPU, 64 GB RAM 3600 MHz, Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB, 500 GB NVMe SSD
2x28" (2560x1440), Windows 10 PRO ENG, Ac20-Ac28
Djordje
Virtuoso
laszlonagy wrote:
1 foot = 12 inches = 12 x 25.4 millimeters = 0.3048 meters in Hungary.
Maybe the difference of your values comes from different rounding.
Laszlo
OK, picky ... Dubai Municipality does not take more than two decimals, they get confused! Yes, I rounded off to 0.305m for one foot!
Djordje



ArchiCAD since 4.55 ... 1995
HP Omen
Karl Ottenstein
Moderator
Hey, we could just legislate a simpler conversion factor like Indiana (a US state) tried to legislate PI to be 3 to make life easy:

http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a3_341.html

http://www.du.edu/~jcalvert/humor/pi.htm



Karl
One of the forum moderators
AC 28 USA and earlier   •   macOS Sequoia 15.2, MacBook Pro M2 Max 12CPU/30GPU cores, 32GB
Anonymous
Not applicable
RENDER KING REVIEW

- - - - - - - - - -
Note:

I post this here because of the large number of ArchiCAD/C4D users who have a notify link for this thread. Talk about workflow! Render King opens the flood gates!

- - - - - - - - - - -


Since MAXON has became a API developer of a new product for ArchiCAD users, it's importance to ArchiCAD Presentations has become all that more significant.

This past weekend I have had the pleasure to test a rather large C4D architectural file on the Render King (Render Farm).

http://www.RenderKing.com

A future review which outlines the process, files types, etc will be also posted, but for now I wanted to relate this information to you immediately because it is so inspiring.

The C4D file is of an office complex with associated site information, parking lot, trees, etc. The model originated in ArchiCAD and was further eloborated in C4D. The file size is approx. 160 MB with textures. The author of this Cinema 4D file is Michael Rensing. Thanks Michael for the terrific test file.


An animation path was set up for 650 frames, @ 720x486 D1 NTSC.

On my G3 Mac - choke - let's just forget it.

On my Dell Precision 340 2Mhz - 15 minutes per frame = 76 hours = 3 days


Compare


The animation on the Render King Network averaged 19 sec. per frame

650 x 19 sec. = 12,350 sec = 206 minutes = 3.5 hours

Oh, oh look out Rounding errors, but seriously you get the picture, the Render King network for C4D is very, very fast.

For large format renderings the tool RenderSlicer can be used.

http://www.hypa.tv/tims/download.html

http://www.renderking.com/rkvisualtut1.htm


Basically Render King gives you access to a $30,000 plus rendering system, without the associated headache of system administration. Not to mention the noise, heat wave and electric bill the racks of computers would create in your office. All for a very reasonable monthly fee.

Considering the speed with which the system rendered the 22 second animation I tested, you could easily create a very long and involved presentation of your project within two weeks. That would give you plenty of time to also incorporate the last minute changes you might experience from your client

Check out Dann Stubb's Render King web site and learn more.



Mark Burginger
Valle Verde Ranch Studio
San Diego, CA
Anonymous
Not applicable
Hi there, here's my first post..

Does anyone know if it is possible to split up the render of a single image
over a network via Cinema 4D NetRender?