2005-06-15 02:50 AM
2005-06-15 12:21 PM
andyro wrote:are you talking about
A Label with 'Detail Name, Detail Number/ID and<PmShNo>- so that people can trace these puppies backwards in the field - this would be a very rich yet simple addition.
2005-06-15 07:44 PM
2005-06-16 04:26 AM
2005-06-16 05:49 AM
is being able to flip through a document set on site, and direct the builder to what section plan or elevation view the detail came fromYep, that's essential...
2005-06-16 05:58 AM
andyro wrote:Not so,IMO,Whose Model( Standard ?),2D CDs and Data,Yours or the Builders?,I guess you can always step up and Build real projects yourselves and take the responsibility,-HTH
is being able to flip through a document set on site, and direct the builder to what section plan or elevation view the detail came from.
When GS begins revolutionizing the way the printed documents work rather than just mirroring the 2D docuement organization in CAD is when GS really begins to outpace the competition...
A
2005-06-16 12:43 PM
Not so,IMO,Whose Model( Standard ?),2D CDs and Data,Yours or the Builders?,I guess you can always step up and Build real projects yourselves and take the responsibility,-HTHOh no, not this crap again!
2005-06-16 03:59 PM
2005-06-16 10:48 PM
James wrote:Back referencing of details is standard practice here in NZ (and England too, from memory). If a detail can be referenced from more than one source, you refer to the first instance. Not sure how this would be implemented in AC, perhaps a dummy marker?
The document reverse reference thing would be complicated by the case of multiple sheets showing the detailed condition.
2005-06-19 02:53 AM