2006-07-11 06:42 PM
2006-07-11 06:47 PM
2006-07-17 09:43 AM
2006-07-17 01:16 PM
gkovacsp wrote:I'm sure that's the intention, but that was not the experience that I've had, not the original poster it seems.
If you load a new (eg AC11) library on an old project (eg. AC10), then all compatible library parts will be automatically replaced by the new ones - based on guid.
2006-07-17 04:37 PM
TomWaltz wrote:On reading the original post it appears that he has not tried opening a file started the AC9 library in AC10. I am guessing that he assumes (based on past experience) that the naming breaks the continuity.gkovacsp wrote:I'm sure that's the intention, but that was not the experience that I've had, not the original poster it seems.
If you load a new (eg AC11) library on an old project (eg. AC10), then all compatible library parts will be automatically replaced by the new ones - based on guid.
2006-07-17 06:33 PM
2006-07-17 06:55 PM
2006-07-17 09:31 PM
gkovacsp wrote:fantastic! but why doesn't it work with archicad AC10 from AC9?
If you load a new (eg AC11) library on an old project (eg. AC10), then all compatible library parts will be automatically replaced by the new ones - based on guid.
2006-07-17 10:03 PM
SmileyMan wrote:I agree with this point. I thought the whole reason for renaming a part is so that it
The other frustration in renaming (for the user) is that it creates the presumption that the part is now somehow updated or changed. For instance, I do not notice any difference between "Book Shelf 01" from AC8 and AC10. And if I am correct, than why isn't this part still called "Book Shelf 01 8" or "7" for that matter? Why not help the user understand that this is still the same? Why should we need to open the GUID's for God's sake?!
2006-07-17 10:08 PM
Geoff wrote:It's kind of a Catch-22. You want to be able to replace a library sometimes and keep them separate in others.SmileyMan wrote:I agree with this point. I thought the whole reason for renaming a part is so that it
The other frustration in renaming (for the user) is that it creates the presumption that the part is now somehow updated or changed. For instance, I do not notice any difference between "Book Shelf 01" from AC8 and AC10. And if I am correct, than why isn't this part still called "Book Shelf 01 8" or "7" for that matter? Why not help the user understand that this is still the same? Why should we need to open the GUID's for God's sake?!doesn'tautomatically replace it's predecessor and thus makes it possible to leave existing objects in ongoing projects and still load the new library without duplication conflicts. Isn't this what the subset libraries are all about?