2003-12-12 09:54 PM
2003-12-17 06:27 PM
2003-12-17 06:39 PM
2003-12-17 10:46 PM
2003-12-18 07:07 AM
Dave wrote:Now I am making a redundant post, just to say that I agree too!
I was going to quote James' post above, but I agree wholeheartedly with his entire post, so I'll avoid the redundancy.
2003-12-18 09:38 AM
2003-12-19 11:50 AM
2003-12-19 12:21 PM
2003-12-19 03:13 PM
~/archiben wrote:Ok... A lot going on in these two threads... First I want to chime in and say the I don't believe it's necessary. I am still the architect and want to control the graphics of my plan. I feel that AC has the power to show this but it does require me to be a thinking human to get there. (not a dig... it just seems like stripping away our thought process is not a good thing. [ and I used to love to draw with pencil; something I don't do enough of anymore]).
being able to model the building and obtain documentation from it at any level is surely the way BIM should progress?
matthew lohden started a topic about this (and much, much more) at . . .
http://archicad-talk.graphisoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=864&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0
. . . where he expresses this development far more eloquently than i can!
my concern will always be file size and hardware capability, however i feel that this development is a must for a true 'virtual building' model to work from.
~/archiben
2003-12-19 04:22 PM