cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Wishes forum

Fills must not be separated in the list!

Anonymous
Not applicable
Fill must not be separated according to thei type - symbol fills and vectorial fills!

Fills with the same names have to stay next to each other!

The screenshot tell everything!

6 REPLIES 6

Anonymous
Not applicable
You do not need so categorically.
Let it be the switch (by type or by name).

Anonymous
Not applicable
A switch or anything else - just to have it!

Anonymous
Not applicable
I agree totally!

owen
Newcomer
A toggle would be best but if I had to pick one 'by name' wins hands down. Strange GS logic at work again .. sort by type and then name....
cheers,

Owen Sharp

Design Technology Manager
fjmt | francis-jones morehen thorp

iMac 27" i7 2.93Ghz | 32GB RAM | OS 10.10 | Since AC5

Anonymous
Not applicable
I agree also! It would make much more sense to default to 'by name' ordering, especially in the tools dialog boxes.

It would still be beneficial when ordered 'by name' to somehow indicate if a fill is symbolic or not. The obvious solution would be to use the existing method, which displays a coloured halo around their icons of the symbolic fills. Like the attached -

rocorona
Contributor
Agree. And maybe with more noticeable color frames...

In addition, what about a sort of "big tooltip" showing the vector fill, when the mouse hover on the bitmap patterns? With the fast computer we have now, this wouldn't be a problem
_________________

--Roberto Corona--
www.archiradar.com
AC18 - ITA full on Win10
_________________
_________________

Start a new conversation!

Still looking?

Browse more topics

Back to forum

See latest solutions

Accepted solutions

Start a new discussion!