2008-06-17 11:36 PM
2008-06-18 01:42 AM
2008-06-22 06:51 PM
2008-06-23 05:21 PM
2008-06-23 06:26 PM
vfrontiers wrote:Beg to differ... Since these settings are VIEWPOINT settings, and not VIEW settings, you will have to create different viewpoints, that is in this case
You don't have to create 2 different elevations, just 2 different VIEWS..
2008-07-19 04:44 PM
2008-07-19 07:24 PM
Thomas wrote:This seems not an altogether bad situation since preliminary/schematic, design development, and construction drawings are often quite different in number, extents and annotations. While it may ultimately be the desirable approach, it seems quite a complex problem of how much of this to move from the viewpoint into the views that derive from it.vfrontiers wrote:Beg to differ... Since these settings are VIEWPOINT settings, and not VIEW settings, you will have to create different viewpoints, that is in this case
You don't have to create 2 different elevations, just 2 different VIEWS..extra, different elevationsif you want views with different looks from the same place, and for these settings to stick, especially if you have say vectorial hatches on one view and color fills with shadows on the other.
This is, as Jeff and Dom points out, not consistent and it's on the wishlist for GS to change it. When? No idea
Until then, you can hide the extra elevation marker by placing it on a hidden layer.